User talk:Fama Clamosa

This is Fama Clamosa's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2: 30 days

This talk page is automatically archived by User:MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 30 days are automatically archived.

Welcome to my talk page. Start a new section. --Fama Clamosa

Phallus indusiatus

Thank you, it was just a mistake, best regards, Naturista2018 (talk) 10:52, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why every edit i made in Wikipedia since becoming active again has been reverted? (Akmaie Ajam)

Hello, Fama Clamosa. Why you revert my edits? All my edits have been reverted by various users. Why? Why Fama Clamosa? (Forwarded to every user that reverted my edits since becoming active again)

This is Akmaie Ajam. Please answer this. Thanks.

I did link to WP:ENGVAR when I reverted you. --Fama Clamosa (talk) 17:52, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Land of Punt

Sorry to complain, but the edits you reinstated were pov. The editor removed material using academic sources calling them pov. For instance the author of one of the books was Ian Shaw (Egyptologist) writing in a Cambridge University Press book still used several times in the article. In fact they wiped out the entire Arabian Peninsula section. I think I probably added quite a bit of that and I avoid fringe like the plague. This seems to be pov editor. See[1] and [2] - note the focus on the Horn of Africa. Any chance of self-reverting? I really don't want to get into an edit-war. Doug Weller talk 12:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done I identified the IP as pov and reverted it, but I didn't read the details carefully. --Fama Clamosa (talk) 12:56, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated. I expect Dalhoa (apologies for not giving you a permalink[3] will be back, but it'll be easier to deal with him if he reverts again. I hope! Doug Weller talk 14:30, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Honorifics

Hello - your recent edit of [4] has been reverted as it breaches MoS. Please review [5] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:9313:B900:C501:3B5E:927A:2FE8 (talk) 19:34, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]