Jump to content

User talk:Vnaroddrux

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Vnaroddrux (talk | contribs) at 16:27, 7 October 2020 (→Early history). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Werner Kaiser (Egyptologist) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Werner Kaiser (Egyptologist), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 07:24, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Günter Dreyer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Qurna. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ijinasi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ijinasi, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 19:21, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

V Narod movement moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, V Narod movement, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~ Amkgp 💬 20:20, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kim seok ok moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kim seok ok, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AviationFreak💬 22:31, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

V Narod movement moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, V Narod movement, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 22:48, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Information icon Hello, I'm GPL93. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 22:49, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Yeon-shil moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kim Yeon-shil, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 23:01, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Donggukisanggukjip

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Donggukisanggukjip requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:24, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Non geumgwangaya rulers

A tag has been placed on Category:Non geumgwangaya rulers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:35, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miss Grand Nepal (August 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Miss Grand International is a non-notable minor international beauty pageant. Miss Grand Nepal is by default a non-notable minor national beauty pageant.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 05:57, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Vnaroddrux! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 05:57, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Acoustic Collabo moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Acoustic Collabo, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster talk 19:23, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Donggukisanggukjip, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yi Ik.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prophecy of Neferti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ameny.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Golden Rock (anthem) has been accepted

Golden Rock (anthem), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 23:47, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the Back to the Future Part II plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 02:43, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tushpuea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armenian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:15, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding whitespace

I see you have a lot of extra whitespace to several articles, contrary to Wikipedia's standard layout. Please stop doing that. Bishonen | tålk 09:19, 14 September 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Oh, come on.. I have reverted a number of articles, but I see you have done the same thing to a lot more. Please go back and revert them yourself, I'm getting tired of it. Why on earth did you do this? Bishonen | tålk 09:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC).[reply]
Oops sorry. Was not aware that was against the layout. I thought it would be beneficial if the paragraphs are spaced enough since its more easy to identify paragraphs and thus easy to read.
I see. Well, it's unlucky that nobody told you before. Look, if you're not up for reverting the whitespace yourself (because I notice you're not doing it), I can do it by the radical method of reverting all your edits. There's a script whereby I can do that with one click, so it would be a lot more convenient for me than what I've been doing. The only problem is that you have also made a few — really not very many — additions of text, and they would go as well. Would that be all right? You can then look at your own contributions, here, where you will easily be able to identify those edits, because they're much bigger, and add them back. However, I see that they're all unsourced. Please only add them back if you provide sources along with them. All right? Please let me know what you think. (Please sign talkpage posts by adding four tildes, ~~~~, which will convert automatically to your signature and a timestamp.) Bishonen | tålk 10:34, 14 September 2020 (UTC).[reply]
Since you have not responded to me, even though you have been editing, I'll have to go by my own best judgement. I've reverted your last 500 edits. I hope that doesn't upset you too much, but doing it one by one is really too time-consuming for me, and you yourself are apparently not prepared to fix the whitespace issue. Please remember what I said above, especially about sources. Bishonen | tålk 22:06, 14 September 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Neolithic sites of Malta

A tag has been placed on Category:Neolithic sites of Malta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:32, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Den (pharaoh), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Apis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:04, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Keenen Ivory Wayans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amistad.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:19, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 10:34, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vnaroddrux (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Understood the reason for blocks was source reference. Would proceed more on draftspace when in doubt.

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

  • Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
  • Read our guide to improving articles.
  • Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
  • If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
    1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
    2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
      • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
      • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
      • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
      • do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
    3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
    4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
    5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
  • Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
  • When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
    • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 13:55, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Traditional patterns of Korea

Early history

In the Neolithic period, Geometric patterns like zigzag or fish bones on korean comb-pattern pottery is attested,as well as on spinning wheels where spiral patterns are observed <refname=":23">http://encykorea.aks.ac.kr/Contents/Item/E0008467Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page).

References

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vnaroddrux&oldid=982351517"