Talk:1885

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

The year in topic layout on this page is one of three versions. I seek opinions before making them all the same; see comment on my talk page

1885 is currently conforming to proposed general model

BUT the "fictional events" section has to go...

--BozMo 12:17, 5 May 2004 (UTC)(talk)[reply]

Format

[See: Talk:1850#Format. -Wikid77 01:58, 25 January 2007 (UTC)][reply]

Wrong Mary Gartside

The link is clearly to a person who cannot have had an appendectomy in 1885. Probably should be clarified or the link dropped. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nashjc (talk • contribs) 20:25, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]