User talk:P924 CarreraGTS

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Directions in architecture

Re this: You were right to correct it on the basics, since I had gotten a little confused writing the article and should have said "west". In architecture, only the four cardinal directions are used to describe the facades of a building (at least in my experience), so "northwest" was more detail than needed. Daniel Case (talk) 03:30, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I will keep that in mind for the future. My edit summary was also not meant to sound like a sarcastic insult of one's intelligence, but basically was in lieu of a citation. P924 CarreraGTS (talk) 16:04, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Like a Boss Edit Conflict

If you are removing our "like a boss" site then remove the one in the references list, to knowyourmeme. How is that fair that they are cited and we are not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by LikeABosscom (talk • contribs) 18:08, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't the website Like A Boss be on the citations in the reference list then if knowyourmem is there? Knowyourmeme website has nothing to do with "like a boss" except for that one page. Our website is 100% like a boss material. I believe and feel strongly that our webpage is a better fit, don't you agree? — Preceding unsigned comment added by LikeABosscom (talk • contribs) 18:16, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How is knowyourmeme proof? Why is that link even needed in the references list? What is it "proving" or "backing up". It's just a webpage with a couple of memes. Are they paying Wikipedia to be here? Also, what is your role on Wikipedia, are you an actual employee or are you doing this as volunteer work? — Preceding unsigned comment added by LikeABosscom (talk • contribs) 18:25, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct, I have never really used wikipedia other than reading various articles. I think I know how to replace knowyourmeme in the reference list. I will make a page on our site that has more sources, more examples and goes in depth further. Hopefully this will be enough to replace them with. Sorry if I sounded rude, I did not mean to come across that way. --LikeABosscom (talk) 18:40, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks for the tips. I am having a hard time figuring out how to add our website as a citation next to knowyourmeme one...Can you please help me? I've read over the link you have sent me but I cannot seem to find it. The only thing I see in the edit screen is "Reflist".--LikeABosscom (talk) 18:54, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, P924 CarreraGTS. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]