Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard
| Wikipedia Arbitration |
|---|
 |
|
|
| Track related changes |
This noticeboard is for announcements and statements made by the Arbitration Committee. Only members of the Arbitration Committee or the Committee's Clerks may post on this page, but all editors are encouraged to comment on the talk page.
Iranian Politics disruption continues
The Arbitration Committee has been made aware by the Wikimedia Foundation's disinformation team of continued disruption in the Iranian Politics (IRANPOL) topic area, which was subject to an ArbCom case last year. Additional measures to address this disruption may be forthcoming in the year ahead from the Arbitration Committee and/or the Wikimedia Foundation. For now, the Arbitration Committee is informing the community of this disruption in the hopes that more editors and administrators may wish to begin working in the IRANPOL topic area. Uninvolved administrators are also reminded that editor restrictions and page restrictions are available for use in the topic area. For the Arbitration Committee, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:15, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- Archived discussion at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 49 § Iranian Politics disruption continues
2023 Arbitration Committee
The Arbitration Committee welcomes the following new and returning arbitrators following their election by the community. The two-year terms of these arbitrators formally begin on 1 January 2023:
- Barkeep49 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- CaptainEek (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- GeneralNotability (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Guerillero (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- L235 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Moneytrees (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Primefac (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- SilkTork (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
All incoming arbitrators have elected to receive the checkuser and oversight permissions.
The Committee will make a further announcement about outgoing arbitrators before the 2023 Committee takes office.
For the Arbitration Committee, Barkeep49 (talk) 22:21, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Change to the Checkuser team
Following a request to the Committee, the CheckUser permissions of Ivanvector (talk · contribs) have been restored.
For the Arbitration Committee, Primefac (talk) 17:48, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
- Archived discussion at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 49 § Change to the Checkuser team
Outgoing members of the 2022 Arbitration Committee
The Arbitration Committee thanks our outgoing colleagues whose terms end on 31 December 2022:
- BDD (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Bradv (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Donald Albury (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Maxim (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Outgoing arbitrators are eligible to retain the CheckUser and Oversight permissions, remain active on cases accepted before their term ended, and to remain subscribed to the functionaries' and arbitration clerks' mailing lists following their term on the committee. To that effect:
- Stewards are requested to remove the permission(s) noted from the following outgoing arbitrators, who did not elect to retain CheckUser or Oversight access, after 31 December 2022:
- CheckUser: BDD, Bradv, Maxim, Donald Albury
- Oversight: BDD, Bradv, Maxim, Donald Albury
- Outgoing arbitrators are eligible to remain active on cases opened before their term ended if they wish. Whether or not outgoing arbitrators will remain active on any ongoing case(s) will be noted on the proposed decision talk page of affected case(s).
- Maxim and Donald Albury will be unsubscribed from the functionaries' mailing list at their request.
- BDD, Maxim, and Donald Albury will be unsubscribed from the arbitration clerks' mailing list at their request.
For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 20:32, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Outgoing members of the 2022 Arbitration Committee
Proposed motion for amendment to Arbitration procedures: Closing Clarification and Amendment Requests
The Arbitration Committee is considering a motion to add an additional route for closing clarification and amendment requests in certain circumstances. Comments are welcomed in the relevant section. For the Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 22:09, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Arbitration motion regarding an amendment to arbitration procedures
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
A section titled "Closing" will be added to Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures under "Requests for amendment" with the following text:
A request for clarification or amendment is eligible to be closed by an arbitrator if:
- A rough consensus has been reached among arbitrators participating in the request; and
- The rough consensus does not require a vote to implement (e.g. modifying the remedy to a case).
The closing arbitrator should include a summary of the rough consensus when closing the request for clarification or amendment.
For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 20:46, 8 January 2023 (UTC)