Talk:Addlestone railway station

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

Surrey Low‑importance

	Surrey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWikipedia:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Addlestone railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050323011423/http://www.ahsoc.fsnet.co.uk:80/tstation.htm to http://www.ahsoc.fsnet.co.uk/tstation.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:21, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Passenger volume section?

My recent edit adding a passenger volume section was reverted by @Murgatroyd49 since it was "already in infobox". I don't really understand this on account of the fact that numerous other articles contain both a dedicated passenger volume table and a section in the infobox (i.e. Falls of Cruachan railway station, Aberdeen railway station). As far as I understand it, an infobox is meant to be a quick overview of information already contained within the article.

Either this should not be permitted on any railway station articles or it should be permitted on all. It should not simply be a random policy on a given page. Lewisgill100 (talk) 15:17, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lewisgill100 Given that editors might not have this on their watchlist, is not a better route to pose this question at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Railways? The articles covered extend further than this one, and the reach will be greater. For my part, I am unsure, as a nod to what you refer about what's in the infobox being in the article, certain other things do not get a mention in the main body (GridRef, total number of platforms, station code etc). That doesn't mean that I don't think they should not be in there either (Falls of Cruachan being an example). There may have been a discussion where consensus was reached to include, or not include. I do know that the infobox is just the last five years worth of stats to avoid that cluttering up the article, otherwise the infobox would be a metre long! Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 12:15, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply, I've now posted my question on the WikiProject talk page as you suggested. Lewisgill100 (talk) 12:27, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]