Talk:Eurovision Dance Contest 2007

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Eurovision Dance Contest 2007 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Eurovision High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eurovision, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Eurovision-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EurovisionWikipedia:WikiProject EurovisionTemplate:WikiProject EurovisionEurovision
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Austria

Please add information about Austrian entrants only after it will be officially confirmed by ORF and not by tabloid media.

Reference links

Please add them only if necessary, and in following order: 1) official sites of EBU, host broadcaster, national broadcasters 2) Eurovision fan sites in order of delivering of breaking news

Ties

Shouldn't Spain considered as 9th place and Portugal 5th, due to both being tied with another country each? Or aren't the ties random except for first places? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.129.154.210 (talk) 21:32, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ties are never random, Portugal placed 6th and Spain (10th), because Austria (5th) and Denmark (9th) were voted by more countries. That new rule was introduced in the year 2006. But remember back in the year 2004, when Croatia (13th) failed to qualify for the 2005 final despite of having the same amount of points of Malta (12th) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tony0106 (talk • contribs) 21:36, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, the EDC rules don't state that... _ZdS| talk 21:46, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just look at my source.. Talk to the EBU, not to me —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tony0106 (talk • contribs) 21:59, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, that rule you stated only applies to ties for first place or the last place which gives access to the final. _ZdS| talk 07:57, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But what does the official scoreboard of the official website of the Eurovision Dance Contest says?? We all know there are absolutely NO ties at the eurovision, either the song contest, the junior or the dance contest.. If you remember lookin at the scoreboard at the end of the voting, you would have noticed Austria outranking Portugal... Please... And is not because I didnt like the portuguese entry, they were awesome, they deserved being in the Top 5.. But thats not the reality.. Plus I hate ties.. lol —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tony0106 (talk • contribs)

Nobody's here complaining that Austria or Portugal or Spain or Denmark should have been ranked higher or lower. It's just that I, personally, have some hard time accepting Eurovision as a source when they contradict themselves (because their rules state nothing about ties in a place other than first). I've since read the Voting at the Eurovision Song Contest article, where it's written, and I quote:

Ties for other places are only officially resolved if they matter for qualification purposes.

So any decision is therefore unnoficial. Plus, there's this rule I didn't know:

For the 2007 contest, the winner in a tie-break situation, would had been the country sang first due to the
advantage of singing later on wheather this will be the case for 2008 is yet to be confirmed.

(sic)
So even if you want to use tie-breakers - which you shouldn't because a) you're biased against ties and b) officially, there is a tie - shouldn't Spain be placed ahead of Denmark? _ZdS| talk 09:44, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Eurovision Dance Contest 2007. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://1tv.com.ua/about/1tvnews/07/09/02/00/54.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:43, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Eurovision Dance Contest 2007. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:41, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]