This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the General Butt Naked article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Evangelical Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Evangelical Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Evangelical ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject Evangelical ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject Evangelical ChristianityEvangelical Christianity
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
Setting aside any possible exaggeration of his acts in wartime, it seems as though the claims about the sources of these behaviors being his native religion and its emphasis on human sacrifice (especially given his alleged grooming to become a high priest) are ultimately coming from him. I don't see confirmation of any of this in the coverage of religion in the main Krahn article, and even some of the sources cited in this article which otherwise report his claims credulously mention as an aside that Christianity and Islam were near-omnipresent before the start of the civil war, when stress and desperation supposedly led to some return to the old ways. As a convert who now makes a living by preaching, he would have good reason to lie about this to cast the native religion and his own behaviors in as negative a light as possible, to make his conversion more spectacular.
If there isn't academic consensus that these claims are at least plausible based on something solid (like existing ethnographic studies of the Krahn), I feel like the article ought to approach them less credulously (even just by adding "allegedly" or "according to him", etc). And if there is some kind of academic analysis of these claims, I think it would be good to describe that more clearly, because all the citations I checked out seem to be lightly researched "the craziest story ever!"-type online articles. But I'm not an experienced Wikipedia editor and I don't know if inserting "allegedly" would cross a line when the sources for the article seem to accept his claims uncritically.
Ntrxz (talk) 04:20, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to improve the article by making it clear where statements are his own, not independently verified. "Allegedly" wouldn't fit there (it's others who might allege something about somebody), but phrases such as "as he described it" or "according to his own account" should work.
Also, new topics on talk pages should be added at the bottom, not at the top. The easiest way of doing so is to click the "Add topic" link below the page title. Gawaon (talk) 05:57, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Gawaon for the correction and suggestions. I've never used a talk page before, as you probably could tell. :) Ntrxz (talk) 13:16, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
