This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
Solidarity (Australia) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Solidarity page created as its leading members came from the largest far left organisation in Australia (International Socialist Organisation) in the 90s but disintegrated due to the numerous splits, particularly the expulsion of leading ISO members who went on to form rival socialist group Socialist Alternative. This article is only yet a stub but I think it will have merit to document the history and direction of the revolutionary Australian left. Marxwasright (talk) 05:35, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The International Socialist Organisation (Australia) (ISO) has merged with an organisation called Solidarity, which has been in existence for several years and was clearly is notable. The post-merger organisation is itself called Solidarity. The question is whether the ISO article should be moved here, and the article should deal with both precursor organisations, or whether a separate article should exist here, a question to which I do not know the answer. mgekelly07:49, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
i think the 2 seperate pages are warranted as the iso page needs a lot of work in terms of expanding and citation, equally the solidarity page can be built apon in terms of the reunification of the 3 former groups and their current orientation. Marxwasright (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
the article appears to have been largely edited by a solidarity member or supporter who seems more motivated by promotion rather than encyclopedic material. apart from the introduction, the article cites no references. likewise, excluding the intro, the article makes no links to other pages. it makes a number of assertions, such as "Solidarity is well known on the Australian left for..." and "Members have played important roles in political movements..." without being backed up. Marxwasright (talk) 18:17, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
article still needs a huge amount of work. while a lot of the text has been neutralized, the majority of the article still makes no links to any other wikipedia articles. i have begun the slow process of going through the provided sources, adding where necessary unreliable source tags. while many sources have been provided, the majority of them make absolutely no reference to solidarity or former iso members'. Marxwasright (talk) 19:23, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
in true stalinistic fashion the unreliable source tags have been removed and even more sources added that make absolutely no reference to either solidarity or the former iso's involvement. i have removed these sources and replaced them with citation tags. this process of blatantly lying about solidarity's actions is not only deceptive and unprincipled but it contravenes the basic guidelines of writing a wikipedia article. Marxwasright (talk) 00:36, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
An image used in this article, File:Soli logo.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 23 September 2011
What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
.svg){kind=logo}
