User talk:Exteahans71

Faryn Pearl moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Faryn Pearl. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:10, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly, Kelly Cooney Cilella has been moved to draft. Meters (talk) 07:35, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But the articles have been reviewed last week. And it was approved. Exteahans71 (talk) 11:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Exteahans71. I just checked the review logs and nowhere does it say that the article was reviewed. You created the article in the mainspace, so it did not go through the articles for creation review process. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:05, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I get it now, can you review it for me. Exteahans71 (talk) 12:07, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did review it. That's why I moved it to draftspace as it is not notable at this point. To learn more about the notability guidelines for filmmakers, please see WP:FILMMAKER and WP:GNG.Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:11, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Kelly_Cooney_Cilella&diff=prev&oldid=1218323140

this is I edit in the first place. This has more sources Exteahans71 (talk) 12:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can’t do it, because the account was blocked by an admin. Exteahans71 (talk) 11:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can appeal the block using the following "{{unblock | reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}" template at the bottom of your talk page. Before making an appeal, please see Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:08, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You never took your time to read what's on Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks. The unblock request that you just made will be declined. It's important that you understand the reasons why the administrator blocked you before starting an unblock request. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:15, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rise (Freya Ridings song)

The article Rise (Freya Ridings song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSONG. No evidence of notability, and only sources are mentions in passing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Meters (talk) 07:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No I don’t that article deleted, this song is very very important. Exteahans71 (talk) 11:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can only use your talk page to appeal your block, you can't use it to discuss articles, etc. Please stop or I'll have to remove your ability to post here. Doug Weller talk 12:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block and unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Exteahans71 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to edit some draft pages, and fix what was is wrongExteahans71 (talk) 12:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As per below. 331dot (talk) 08:21, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Bbb23, fun fact: user is a perfect CU-match with User:Chatterleybuns958, blocked by User:HJ Mitchell, two days before this account was started--and with the same kinds of problems, including a tenuous hold on the English language. Drmies (talk) 12:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: What a shocking "fun fact". :p Any objection to my making the block of the master sitewide and tagging the two accounts as confirmed? It will make some of the garbage created by the sock G5able.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No objection. You may have seen the other, related warning I just placed; that editor prompted me to check in the first place. Drmies (talk) 12:42, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean HiveEmperor? No, I just looked at it now.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not connected to HiveEmperor, that’s not me, that was someone else. Exteahans71 (talk) 13:16, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The new kid in town is User:Imrubygillman. User:DoubleGrazing, you're looking at the reincarnation of Draft:Production of Ruby Gillman, Teenage Kraken--please look here on this page first, and the history, if you're not aware. Drmies (talk) 15:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Drmies: I was literally just in the process of pinging you and Bbb23 to ask. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drmies, I'm assuming you've checked Imrubygillman and found that they are not a sock? If so, what about meat? I could block them regardless, but I'd rather be enlightened first. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:34, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I don't know. Geolocation was sort of possibly not so far away, but it's a crowded area. Meat--the other editor is much more aggressive and hasn't actually said much, but in some places their language is very much the same; just look at the grammar and punctuation here. Ha, update: they went to their job or their regular coffee house or whatever, and they're now CU-confirmed. ;) Drmies (talk) 15:47, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've tagged and deleted/reverted everything.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How dare you, you’re gonna regret this, Bbb23, this is a seperate account. I’m not a sockpuppet, I’m using this account to draft new articles. Exteahans71 (talk) 16:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I regret lots of things, but this is unlikely to be one of them. TPA revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Denying the sockpuppetry is pointless as it has been proven via the technical logs. And issuing personal threats isn't going to help your cause. Barry Wom (talk) 16:27, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]