User talk:JarJarInks

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

JarJarInks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

IP (149.19.42.43) was blocked as part of an Open Proxy. The computer I am forced to use for the majority of the day has administrative overrides that require it to be connected to an internal closed proxy in order to function. I am also blocked from creating unblock requests through the ticket system. All edits I will make will be made through the JarJarInks account and not anonymously through the IP. JarJarInks (talk) 16:59, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

This is not a closed proxy but instead, an open proxy. However, you have explained why this is happening and to the extent I'm capable, I have verified this. I have granted you WP:IPBE for six months. See below for details. If you make constructive edits during this time, you are free to request an extension if necessary, in six months. Yamla (talk) 17:50, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IP block exempt

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit the English Wikipedia through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions. Inappropriate usage of this user right may result in revocation. I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. Yamla (talk) 17:50, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! JarJarInks (talk) 17:54, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a way to remove my reasoning from my talk page while keeping the logs available to admins? I'd rather not make my relative location public if possible. JarJarInks (talk) 18:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to remove all content from this page. That would keep it in the history. It's unusual to hide it from the history as well, but if you believe you have a compelling need, remove what you'd like hidden and let me know. I'll take you at your word that you have a compelling need, but please don't abuse that. :) --Yamla (talk) 18:49, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Autism Creature (November 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Samoht27 were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This article doesn't show how its notable, I'd recommend adding citations to reliable sources, this article currently relies on usergenerated content quite heavily, which is often unreliable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Autism Creature and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Samoht27 (talk) 15:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JarJarInks! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Samoht27 (talk) 15:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Autism Creature (December 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kline was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Twitter, YouTube, KnowYourMeme, and Tumblr are not reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Autism Creature and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kline • talk • contribs 17:09, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:JarJarInk's Dogs 2.jpg

The file File:JarJarInk's Dogs 2.jpg has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the file should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:01, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse

Hello, JarJarInks,

Welcome to editing Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions but you have only been editing for a few weeks and have an editing history of only 61 edits. Please wait until you have much more editing experience before trying to answer questions at the Teahouse. Questions are typically answered by editors who have years of experience and solid knowledge of the project's policies and guidelines. Giving an incorrect answer is worse than no answer at all. I hope you understand and feel free to come to the Teahouse with your own questions and help out there after you have been editing for several months. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:37, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]