User talk:Red-tailed hawk

Red-tailed hawk is busy and is going to be on Wikipedia in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries.

This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back. Their input is welcome, and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

Gift

—As a natural turkey predator, please graciously accept my gift. May your hawk-spouse and hawk-children be well-fed this Thanksgiving season. All the best, Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 01:46, 27 November 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you for your generous oblation, Dr. Swag Lord. I hope all is well. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 06:56, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Username query

Hi Red-tailed Hawk. Do you think Chennur Public Front is a problem per WP:ORGNAME? It has the ring of being the name of a political party or some other organization, but not sure. FWIW, I'm asking you about it because you're the first admin I came across while scrolling down the page history of WP:UAA. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:38, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly (talk page stalker) Typically, if I'm not sure about usernames like that, I'll leave {{subst:uw-coi-username}} on the talk page. It's for just this sort of situation. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 06:16, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. I did start to leave a {{uw-username}} but stopped and decided to ask for additional input first. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:18, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd have to look through the edits closely to actually figure that out. I can't find an organization with that name, though I agree that it's not unreasonable to ask the account what the meaning of their name is by leaving a message on their talk page. If they respond that they are an organization, or that it's a shared account, then we could go from there. Otherwise, I don't think it's a blatant violation unless its edits give the impression that it represents a particular group. The advice given by our fellow equine appreciator is a very reasonable approach, in light of this. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 07:01, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking a look at this. I did follow the advice given above by I dream of horses. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:10, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TB?

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Doug_Weller#User_TheCuratingEditor

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/TheCuratingEditor Doug Weller talk 14:01, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think ScottishFinnishRadish has been handing them out in similar circumstances. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 14:49, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Doug Weller talk 16:07, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, Red-tailed hawk. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:37, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Received — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 19:06, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Palestine-Israel articles 5 arbitration case opened

You offered a statement in an arbitration enforcement referral. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5/Evidence. Please add your evidence by 23:59, 14 December 2024 (UTC), which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Introduction. For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 06:14, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tellus (app) has been accepted

Tellus (app), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

charlotte ^👸♥ 06:04, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Temp userpage redirect

I see that you have created a redirect at Draft:Temp userpage pointing to User talk:CFA. I see no reason for that redirect to exist, so you may be able to apply WP:G7 to it. GTrang (talk) 17:11, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that catch; didn’t mean to leave that behind when I moved the user’s talk page back to its appropriate place. — Red-tailed sock _{(Red-tailed hawk's nest)} 17:36, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]