Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alliance Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:13, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alliance Records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Record label, who may have some notable clients, is not it's self notable. (see WP:Inherited) - Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG as it has not had significant coverage of it's own. Has been un-sourced for nearly five years. Codf1977 (talk) 20:03, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, until notability is established. --Matt57 ^{(talk•contribs)} 00:13, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The musicians are notable, but the record label isn't. Joe Chill (talk) 00:41, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no sources, notability not established. Maashatra11 (talk) 16:41, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.