Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BNU Buccaneers
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:35, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- BNU Buccaneers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. British university sports teams for mainstream British sports are rarely notable even within their own institution, never mind in the real world. This team isn't one of the mere handful of exceptions to this rule. A quick google returns nothing beyond sites related to the team's rivals (the team doesn't appear to have it own site). Article is also unreferenced. Pit-yacker (talk) 13:56, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. —Pit-yacker (talk) 14:01, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 16:39, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. It's very rare for a British university sports team to be notable, and like other university American football teams recently nominated, this one does not appear to be an exception to this rule. Pfainuk talk 18:14, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no sources, no article.--Paul McDonald (talk) 19:18, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - There's only a few notable uni teams in the United Kingdom. This isn't one of them. (Especially since a Google search only brings up their pages and those of their rivals.) DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 22:12, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.