Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drag Bicycles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:32, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Drag Bicycles

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable brand of bicycle from a non-notable company. Since it was created by a WP:SPA and it contained promotional material (since cleaned up) the article is essentially spam. It is giving one organisation a commercial advantage over others (an unfortunate artefact of WP:OTHERSTUFF). -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 20:42, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There is nothing to indicate it passes WP:GNG or WP:CORP. But there could be coverage in Bulgarian that might. I'd be willing to change my vote, if there is. Hoppingalong (talk) 21:25, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If the Bulgarian sources prove to be significant and reliable and have not spilled over into English language sources do they make the topic notable?? -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 09:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment- That is a good question. WP:N requires Reliable Sources that pass WP:RS. WP:NOENG which is part of WP:V says that Reliable Sources can be non-Enlgish. And Wp:GNG says itself that sources "are not required to be in English." Although, I would be skeptical of a company passing WP:CORP or WP:GNG entirely because of references in one language other than English, yet having absolutely nothing in English, global economy and all. Either way, I do not think we have that case here. Hoppingalong (talk) 04:02, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 17:20, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There has been plenty of time and plenty of edits, but none of the provided sources even mentions the bike brand, not even the one in Bulgarian as far as I can tell with the automatic page translation provided by Google Chrome. -AndrewDressel (talk) 14:20, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.