Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Festival Airlines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 05:55, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Festival Airlines

Another failed airline start up, it seems. No non-trivial independent sources. Guy (Help!) 22:20, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 05:45, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 05:45, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I agree with you, through work at WP:AVIATION this article is not notable per WP:N and never got off the ground. -Marcusmax(speak) 00:22, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails notability per WP:CORP. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 03:15, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fail WP:N--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:58, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CORP. They got some RS coverage in mid-late 2006 when they announced their plans but nothing since. • Gene93k (talk) 05:18, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a clear case of WP:CRYSTAL until it flies.Peterkingiron (talk) 10:34, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm all for it if we could find some non-trivial coverage in reliable third party publications. Oh, wait, we can't? JBsupreme (talk) 21:56, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.