Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Generational planet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 19:04, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Generational planet

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. The entire article is just uncritically presenting astrological beliefs. Un assiolo (talk) 14:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astrology-related deletion discussions. Un assiolo (talk) 14:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unsourced astrology cruft. Should have been deleted years ago. Walsh90210 (talk) 22:38, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The article probably needs to be entirely wiped and stubbed, but the topic *may* be notable. With quick searches I can only find (obviously unreliable) astrology sources, and I can't tell how big it is, but it could have been covered by people studying astrologists. It's kind of an interesting mythology and it would be nice to have an article about it. I think that if at least one non-astrology source can be found, it should be stubbed and kept. Mrfoogles (talk) 01:40, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Virtually unsourced astrology cruft (though it could be useful on an astrology Wiki, I admit). TH1980 (talk) 23:29, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect or merge selectively to Planets in astrology. Poor sourcing, but it could be better discussed in context of the other planets. It’s a fringe of a fringe idea, for which we require special care and sourcing. Bearian (talk) 03:04, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.