Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Go Promotional
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. LFaraone 00:26, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Go Promotional (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No in-depth secondary sources establishing notability, no significant coverage. 2 of the 4 sources are their own press-releases, another source does not mention the subject at all. The first source is a press release by another company, which hardly seems objective either. Crispulop (talk) 18:00, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- Looks to me like a NN advrtising agency. Notabilitry is not inherited, so that having notable clients confers no notability. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:46, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.