Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hear Kitty Studios
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:29, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Hear Kitty Studios (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Reads like an advertisement, lacks third party sources that verify significance beyond confirming that the company exists. Battleaxe9872 17:17, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I hope to have improved the tone, as your point is well taken. I am also gathering more outside sources. KingTor (talk) 18:17, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete. Completely non-notable. Very few Google hits. Also exists a conflict of interest. Christopher Connor (talk) 21:02, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per A7, no indication of notability. Armbrust Talk Contribs 21:45, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:53, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.