Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanthak
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 01:53, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Kanthak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested seconded prod. Non-notable company, sources given are unreliable. Haakon (talk) 14:39, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Fails WP:CORP. No references from third-party sources. Tevildo (talk) 14:55, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 15:56, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- - 2/0 (cont.) 20:42, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- - 2/0 (cont.) 20:42, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete wP:BURDEN, it is up to the article authors to prove WP:GNG. If Joe Chill can't find sources, I won't either. Miami33139 (talk) 05:55, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.