Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Dunnerstick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 03:32, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Dunnerstick

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor producer. First movie isn't even released yet at an independent film festival. v/r - T P 03:44, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, my speedy deletion tag was removed. One credit to a movie that hasn't even been released yet is not notability. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 04:34, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your tag was a CSD A7. If you read WP:CSD, A7 does not require notability; it requires a claim of significance. One credit is a claim of significance and so this article must either be deleted via WP:PROD or WP:AFD. Please read WP:WIHSD (take no offense at the title, it's a good essay). Be sure to use A7 correctly in the future.--v/r - T P 13:48, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I did use A7 correctly. Your reasoning is faulty. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 16:46, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A search of Google news, Google news archive, and other news databases turns up no coverage of Mr. Dunnestick. He does not appear to meet notability standards. Also, I note that, in the past 3 years, the only edits by the article's creator, "Coydecoy" (interesting name choice) relate to Dunnerstick and his current film project. Possible WP:COI concern, but since notability is not met, delete is appropriate on that ground alone. Cbl62 (talk) 00:30, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:24, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete but it is good for these to come to AfD, not speedy, because someone might actually be able to show something about notability. What was not good was to write the article this early; it would have been much better written after the film had premiered and there had been some reviews published--and even then, unless there was actually something else to be said about the director, the article about the film would have been enough. One article, not two. DGG ( talk ) 23:26, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of any notable sources. When I typed in "Matt Dinnerstick" in both Yahoo! and Google, all I found was his IMDb page. SwisterTwister talk 05:54, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without prejudice against recreation if this movie is successful and/or (of course) if he's successful further down the road. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 22:50, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NotJustYet. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:33, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.