Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadia Mukami

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kieran207(talk-Contribs) 02:10, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nadia Mukami

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A promotional article for a non notable musician who fails to satisfy any criterion from WP:MUSICBIO and lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. A WP:BEFORE search shows links to self published unreliable sources. WP:TOOSOON definitely applies here also. Celestina007 (talk) 23:52, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:52, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:52, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:52, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:52, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:52, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete2601:8B:C380:56A0:B54A:9D9C:E275:B3C0 (talk) 00:17, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Umm I assume you agree with my rationale but you actually have to write your own rationale as to why the article ought to be deleted. A mere Delete with no rationale isn’t & would never be considered. Celestina007 (talk) 01:08, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why does the signature go to Siamese Fighting Fish...? ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 01:46, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with text revisions. I'm not convinced this artist fails WP:MUSICBIO. They've been nominated for an MTV Africa award and their singles have achieved significant radio play, etc. They've also received media coverage from a variety of news outlets. The biggest issue with the page is the MOS:PUFFERY writing style. If that were addressed it would be a good stub, even with the too soon concerns raised.--Dnllnd (talk) 15:37, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: the article already cites a substantial number of articles about her in the Kenyan news media. Furius (talk) 17:55, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Clearly notable. Easy to find news coverage about her. Plus she's Verified on Instagram with 1.3 million followers. She's no nobody. I'll see what I can do about the tone/style of the article. T.B.A. (talk) 19:25, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: More than sufficient coverage in secondary sources.--Ipigott (talk) 07:14, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: This article definitely satisfies the WP:MUSICBIO They have been nominated for big awards in Kenya "PMVA" and big awards in Africa "MTV Africa Music Awards" Im either not convinced that it's too soon they have 38 million views total on YouTube. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PushaWasha (talk • contribs) 15:55, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.