Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PetroChem Wire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:32, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PetroChem Wire

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company which does not meet WP:CORP or WP:GNG. Article contains no sources that offer significant coverage of PetroChem Wire, and none can be found.

Notes: the creating account, User:Petrochemwire, was blocked for COI editing. User:Boulderpr account was then created and after removing a prod on this article, was blocked for COI. User:Jgkeener account was then created and removed a second prod on this article. According to http://www.boulderpr.com/clients/, PetroChem Wire is a client of Keener Communications (aka Jim Keener). Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 02:23, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions.
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 02:46, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.