Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PhaseWare

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 06:45, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PhaseWare

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP. Findsources produces no reliable sources (news, books) indicating any notablility of this company. There are plenty of press releases, paid CRM reviews and marketing materials out there but nothing that meets WP:RS Toddst1 (talk) 13:19, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. 15:42, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:42, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt. Another information technology corporation ... that develops, sells and supports customer service software products and services advertising on Wikipedia. This meaningless text is not an assertion of minimal importance, and neither is the claim that the primary goal in the foundation of the company was to expand customer support management software into the small and medium-sized business market and to implement workflow automation functionality into these markets. Google News links are all pr.web / prweb.com. Note also two prior speedy deletions for spam / failure to assert significance. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:42, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now - Multiple News searches failed to provide anything substantial, only promotional links and press releases aside from another review. One of the press releases here says they were a finalist in an award show but I haven't found any third-party links. Additionally, it seems they haven't received any attention since the end of 2011, nothing for 2012 or 2013. The only links to support their clients would be primary. As a Dallas-Fort Worth resident, I've never heard of this company though I'm not familiar with every single Texas-based company of course. I have no prejudice towards a future article when notability is established. SwisterTwister talk 04:06, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm unable to find sufficient evidence (i.e., significant coverage in independent reliable sources) that this company meets WP:GNG or WP:CORP. Gong show 01:31, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.