Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punch! Software
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. v/r - TP 03:05, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Punch! Software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to fail WP:N: no significant coverage in third-party sources. If anything, the software is notable, not the company. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:14, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:48, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:44, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. This business makes CAD products for people doing landscaping, redesigning kitchens abd bathrooms, and the like. The article as it stands now is not very clear on this. I don't find anything that looks like a reliable independent source providing significant coverage for this. Hint: if it says leads the home design software market or leading provider of home design and CAD software solutions, it isn't an independent source. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:44, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Legis (talk - contribs) 04:38, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - software article with no 3rd party refs to establish notability. Dialectric (talk) 00:39, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Totally WP:SPAM! -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 00:14, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.