Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revmob
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. SpinningSpark 07:42, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Revmob (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability not established QVVERTYVS (hm?) 18:39, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed - Reads like blatant advertising. For instance, "Its founder, Gui Schvartsman, is a guru of monetization and was able to make several million dollars out of these two games. " Powerpiper (talk) 20:01, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Of the sourcing in the article, the TNW article is okay, but is in specialty/trade magazine/site. The mobiel marketer article is marginal, and the performance marketing insider article is an interview. I could find no other coverage myself. Taken together, I don't think this is sufficient to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:00, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.