Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seriously Endangered Xobats
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mkativerata (talk) 23:29, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Seriously Endangered Xobats (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No reliable sources found. Article is direct copy of bio on the Reverbnation site here. Haruth (talk) 21:58, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete One person, with friends, making music is not notable until secondary sources say so. BigJim707 (talk) 22:35, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:40, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. Note that I have removed the material that was copied from Reverb Nation. -- Whpq (talk) 13:53, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: per nom, fails WP:Music. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 05:41, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wow, there isn't even any unreliable-source coverage. —chaos5023 (talk) 04:26, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable music group.--EdwardZhao (talk) 20:19, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.