Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skyline Turbine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:13, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Skyline Turbine

Non-notable company, tagged for over a month. Was dePRODded without comment, and edits since then have not addressed my concern about not meeting WP:CORP. Makes some claims, but they are not supported by cites, and the cites that are provided make no support for notability. There is lots of material about the general field of their business and where their business and products are located, but this is the article for this company--articles about wind turbines and other general things are elsewhere--and I don't see anything notable about this company or it's products in particular. DMacks (talk) 03:27, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - I'm the admin who deprodded it while patroling the expired prod lists. Four refs to non-trivial news sources indicated to me that this met the standard. AKRadecki^Speaketh 15:39, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment...that's just it: they are news sources that support the notability wind-power and alt-energy in general ("The work that Skyline Turbine is engaged in is in line with building momentum in this country for alternative energy in response to geopolitical pressure from abroad.") but not this company. Some don't even mention the company at all. DMacks (talk) 17:33, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:02, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment... I wrote the original article and agree it should be deleted. Thanks for the thoughtful comments. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Neurorocker (talk • contribs) 17:55, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:40, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I fail to see how the references meet the requirements of WP:N. This is simply a dealer and not even a company. Fails WP:CORP Vegaswikian (talk) 06:10, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.