Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Custom Mary
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 14:44, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The Custom Mary (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreleased independent film by nonnotable producer. WP:CRYSTAL issues. v/r - TP 03:45, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per nom and for the reasons cited at AfD/Matt Dunnerstick. A search of Google news, Google news archive, and other news databases turns up no significant coverage of the unreleased film. It does not appear to meet notability standards. Also, I note that, in the past 3 years, the only edits by the article's creator, "Coydecoy" (interesting name choice) relate to The Custom Mary and its producer Matt Dunnerstick. Possible WP:COI concern, but since WP:GNG is not met (and the WP:CRYSTAL issued raised by nom), delete is appropriate on those grounds. Cbl62 (talk) 00:35, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:25, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete too soon--better to have waited until there were actual reviews. I am not altogether sure that G11 as promotional might not apply here. Some of the links go to people of the same name who are not the actors, which is not a good sign. But Bill McKinney at least is a well established character actor, so if it is the same person, perhaps the film might even turn out to be notable in the end. DGG ( talk ) 23:32, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NotJustYet. Okay with userfication back to author while he/we wait for the film to be screened and get some critical commentary. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 07:35, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.