Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toni Preckwinkle (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Once again. Eluchil404 04:11, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Toni Preckwinkle

Suggest delete because the article fails WP:BLP through a complete lack of reliable sources about the subject. Wikipedia is not a personal webhost. This may qualify as a DB-REPOST as it has been deleted once before for similar reasons. Burntsauce 17:56, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment As it happens, a Chicago alderwoman is the example in Wikipedia:Deletion policy/Local politicians (a discussion which reached no consensus). --Dhartung | Talk 05:01, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 15:25, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator due to a lack of non-trivial third party sources about the person. I'm not familiar with the general notability of alderpersons, but the examples cited by Dhartung appears to be several years old, predating WP:BLP and other relatively more modern guidelines created to address these issues. Yamaguchi先生 23:49, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete whats next the town dog-catcher will get an article? Very minor politician, no third party references worth a damn. Just nuke it already. ALKIVAR™ ☢ 04:50, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.