Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vistra (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salting can be requested at WP:RFPP Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:22, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vistra

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Struggling to find anything approaching independent in-depth coverage. Likely fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Edwardx (talk) 11:26, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:29, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:29, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Salt A solid attraction for the WP:PROMO crowd. I cleared a bunch of advertising out of it, months ago, and then did it again, and now it's starting to creep back up, with the same content!. scope_creep (talk) 12:31, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per above, already deleted before, will probably be deleted again.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 18:49, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.