Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yung L

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SpinningSpark 19:15, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yung L

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not enough in depth coverage from secondary sources to establish notability thereby failing WP:GNG —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 21:59, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:00, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:00, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep article is about a notable musical artist, more coverage can be found here, here (July 2014) and here. Stanleytux (talk) 22:35, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stanleytux, aside the first two sources you provided (which are interviews), I still do not think the subject has been discussed in significant details. The third source is a gossip which obviously isn't enough to prove notability. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:57, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The two sources aren't all interviews. Stanleytux (talk) 05:54, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the article does not support WP:ENTERTAINER criteria.--Rpclod (talk) 01:57, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That may not be relevant here since subject isn't an actor, comedian, opinion maker or model. The guideline is WP:MUSICBIO, which is more appropriate in this case. Stanleytux (talk) 06:08, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite : This article need to be rewritten means it should be move to draft space to meets its guideline apart from that reliable source are not listed on the article. --Music Boy50 (talk) 13:29, 5 November 2016 (UTC) Blocked sock.—Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 07:22, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:19, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Interviews are not reliable for the main body of information. There is not enough coverage to pass for notability.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 18:07, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - assuming the information in the interviews can be duplicated, he would pass notability. So far, that's an if .... Bearian (talk) 23:18, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm not particularly convinced by the sources and I don't see any awards/charting. I personally think this might be a case of WP:TOOSOON. Should there be better coverage, I don't have any objection to recreation. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 02:19, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Week Keep I think it fulfills WP:GNG by a whisker...Rameshnta909 (talk) 17:24, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.