Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zafferano
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:29, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Zafferano (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unremarkable restaurant Aiken ♫ 18:23, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- You are contesting this on ground of notability? Article's creator, - Jarry1250 [Humorous? Discuss.] 18:43, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes. Aiken ♫ 18:53, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, so not only has the Zafferano got a Michelin star (not a mean feat in itself; only 140 restaurants in the UK have one) and is listed in major food guides for London, but has also won a number of awards including the top prize at Tatler's 2009 Restaurant Awards for "Most Consistently Excellent Restaurant." Along with plenty of third-party coverage, of course, e.g. The London Evening Standard. - Jarry1250 [Humorous? Discuss.] 19:12, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, well, I found nothing particularly remarkable in an internet search about this restaurant, hence the AFD. If you expand the article to show how it is notable, I'll happily withdraw this. Aiken ♫ 19:28, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, so not only has the Zafferano got a Michelin star (not a mean feat in itself; only 140 restaurants in the UK have one) and is listed in major food guides for London, but has also won a number of awards including the top prize at Tatler's 2009 Restaurant Awards for "Most Consistently Excellent Restaurant." Along with plenty of third-party coverage, of course, e.g. The London Evening Standard. - Jarry1250 [Humorous? Discuss.] 19:12, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes. Aiken ♫ 18:53, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- You are contesting this on ground of notability? Article's creator, - Jarry1250 [Humorous? Discuss.] 18:43, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Needs expansion thoughOnefinalstep (talk) 23:10, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:26, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:26, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.