Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Hotel Du Loone
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: No consensus to delete at this time. Regarding the suggestion to block, the IP has not edited since 25 November, so I can't justify blocking for preventative reasons, but a resumption of disruptive activity could justify a block. RL0919 (talk) 03:52, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
This draft is under a spam session (updated the nomination now that things are clarified). Keeps getting resubmitted without any improvements. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 18:21, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Do not delete this page this is a page for brat webseries — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:40E:4000:C760:EDB8:9375:7FCF:5E4F (talk) 18:29, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note that 2601:40E:4000:C760:EDB8:9375:7FCF:5E4F is the resubmiter in question of all this. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 18:34, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Comment - No claim of notability made by user, problematic user conduct within the AfC process. But a google search throws up some sources.[1][2] This strikes me as a WP:HEY scenario. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 18:35, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for listing some sources to help the submitter for the start (still not enough for notability in my opinion, especially with second being a very, very passing mention). Jovanmilic97 (talk) 18:44, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
- It's certainly not spam. Is there a limit on the number of submission that become disruptive? (I'm sure it is, but a red line would be usefu). ——SerialNumber54129 18:37, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
- Look at the history of draft. Spamming submissions with no improvements is something to be taken care of in my opinion. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 18:39, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
- I know. I'm saying it cannot be delted as spam, so it should not be called spam. It may be crap; but that's a bit of an WP:ATADD isn't it. ——SerialNumber54129 18:45, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Though I am not sure what should we do then? How to solve this mess now? Blocking the user? I have no idea. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 18:48, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
- I know. I'm saying it cannot be delted as spam, so it should not be called spam. It may be crap; but that's a bit of an WP:ATADD isn't it. ——SerialNumber54129 18:45, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
- Look at the history of draft. Spamming submissions with no improvements is something to be taken care of in my opinion. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 18:39, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
References
- ^ Chuba, Kirsten (2018-05-30). "Brat Sets First Multicam Sitcom with 'Hotel Du Loone' (EXCLUSIVE)". Variety. Retrieved 2018-11-25.
- ^ "Hayley LeBlanc to Star in New Digital Sitcom 'Hotel Du Loone' | TigerBeat". tigerbeat.com. Retrieved 2018-11-25.
- Comment Update: The submitter tried to cheat the system of MfD by creating another draft with the same text on Draft:Hotel Du Loone (webseries). Jovanmilic97 (talk) 18:47, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Not spam, but the tendentious resubmission is disruptive, and the resubmission has crossed the 3RR line into submit-warring. Yes, the IP should be blocked. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:47, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
- Also Delete the redirect which was an attempt to game the system. Bundling the duplicate article would be another valid response to the duplication. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:50, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep and block IP. I've added the sources to the article (Broadway World, Tiger Beat, Variety). The series does exist and I've added the episode links, but there's not much coverage about it other than that it was developed and premiered. Need reviews from critics and reception. In the meantime, I've created a redirect to Brat (digital network) for the mainspace. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:23, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.