Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mr Anonymous 699

Mr Anonymous 699

Mr Anonymous 699 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mr Anonymous 699/Archive.

29 November 2024

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets

• Based Kashmiri (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• NXcrypto (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

• NXcrypto moved numerous pages that had been previously nominated for speedy G5 deletion by Based Kashmiri. Following Kashmiri's block on June 9, 2024 as confirmed sock, from June 12 June, 2024 NXcrypto proceeded to move pages to Draft space that had failed speedy deletion proposals, all of which had been initiated by Kashmiri.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]

• Both Based Kashmiri and NXcrypto provided substantial contributions to the article Devapala of Bengal.[13][14]

• Based Kashmiri created page List of Pala emperors,[15] linked on Dharmapala of Bengal[16] later NXcrypto removed the same link from see also.[17]

• Their interests and edit logs pertain to the Draftification of battle and war related articles on Indian history.[18][19][20][21][22] IAmAtHome (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

The evidence is misleading at best. For one, the writing style of NXcrypto and Based Kashmiri and edit summaries are completely different, as evident by the links you posted in your second point[23][24] BasedKashmiri went through many checks and any account that has been editing during that same period would have been caught long ago. - Ratnahastin (talk) 02:32, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

It is prudent to refrain from rushing to judgment and instead await the CU updates. A thorough examination reveals more than twelve distinct discrepancies that substantiate the report's findings. Notably, there is no requirement that edit summaries be strictly matched. Given that previous assessments targeting Kashmiri accounts did not uncover similar instances, it would be wise to adopt a cautious approach and wait for further clarification.IAmAtHome (talk) 02:09, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

This response appears to be AI generated [25]. - Ratnahastin (talk) 02:21, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

That wasn't an AI response since such sites sometimes provide inaccurate information. Human-generated text also appears as AI text with less or more percentage of claims when you scan there. The external link for checking AI-generated text may not always be accurate. [Different sites evaluate different% of AI-generated claims for the same content 85%,[26] 53%,[27] 5%,[28] 0%[29] (You also scan my this comment and check; it will also show different results on these sites because these all sites always claim different % of AI generated in your provided text.) Being a native Pashto speaker, I may have some grammar limitations. You can check my previous talk page interactions and edit summaries to see what I mean. I took an assistant tool for translation and grammar. IAmAtHome (talk) 08:14, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Please do not significantly modify your original comment after it has already been replied to. Thanks. - Ratnahastin (talk) 09:27, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

---