Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rjbronn/Archive

Rjbronn

Rjbronn (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

17 January 2011

Suspected sockpuppets

StanfordUniversity (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
CiteChecker (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Following the AN report filed on Rjborrn, I think it would be worthwhile to take a look at these three accounts. The activity of these new accounts in the article History of Azerbaijan speaks for itself. Thank you! Tuscumbia (talk) 16:29, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Clerk endorsed - I've blocked CiteChecker per WP:DUCK, but a CU would clarify the relationship between the other two. (And does StanfordUniversity violate the username policy?) — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 17:05, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Confirmed all three are the same. TN X Man 18:37, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator note Socks blocked and tagged, master blocked three days. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 19:26, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

24 January 2011

Suspected sockpuppets

67.169.112.181 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

The user Rjbronn is back to disruptive editing and blind reverts [1], [2], [3] and uses his new sock IP 67.169.112.181 ([4]) with bunch of nationalistic and chauvinistic details. Tuscumbia (talk) 14:47, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wow :))) This made my day :) This sockpuppeteer is actually presenting himself as an admin? Tuscumbia (talk) 14:49, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Administrator note Alright, we're done here. I've indef blocked Rjbronn for sockpuppeting, harassment, and just general disruption. And I've blocked that IP for a month. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 15:16, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

25 January 2011

Suspected sockpuppets

FactPatrol (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Brand new user, and their first few edits are to ask me about previous Rjbronn cases. All of their edits have been either to undo previous edits on the same pages in question, or to accuse other editors. I suppose this could be meatpuppetry - hence the CU. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 01:42, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

SlimVirgin already blocked, so I'm closing. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 02:49, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]