Wikivoyage:Votes for deletion: Difference between revisions
→Bardibas: archive |
→Zhucheng: Reply |
||
(38 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
{{WikivoyageDoc|collaboration}} |
{{WikivoyageDoc|collaboration}} |
||
== |
==December 2024== |
||
===[[Poręba wielka]]=== |
|||
Seems like obvious [[copyvio]] from Wikipedia, although I'm not immediately finding it at en.wikipedia. But it's certainly a stub that's in a totally non-Wikivoyage [[style]] and has text copied from somewhere, without any acknowledgement. I attempted to engage the article-starter on [[User talk:OrkanWładysław]], but there has as yet been no response. I would have summarily deleted this article without a nomination if I had found the source of the text. [[User:Ikan Kekek|Ikan Kekek]] ([[User talk:Ikan Kekek|talk]]) 17:28, 4 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:I can't find the source of this either. However it is a dump of text that is likely to have been machine translated from a document that is not available online. Unless someone wants to take a chainsaw to it and turn it into a Wikivoyage article, it think we should '''delete''' it to be on the safe side of our copyvio policy. [[User:Ground Zero|Ground Zero]] ([[User talk:Ground Zero|talk]]) 12:20, 7 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | *'''Delete''' Given the nature of it, it's better to nuke it and start this article afresh if someone is willing to make this a proper viable travel article. --<span style="font-family:BlinkMacSystemFont; font-size: 14px">[[User:SHB2000|<span style="color:#0b6487">SHB2000</span>]] <small>([[User talk:SHB2000|t]] | [[Special:Contributions/SHB2000|c]] | [[m:User:SHB2000|m]])</small></span> 12:32, 7 December 2024 (UTC) |
||
===[[ |
===[[Salerno, Paestum and Amalfi]]=== |
||
Not an itinerary. No edits for more than a year. Badly formatted. No information that isn't already in the articles for the three cities listed. The article's creator added a bunch of text that was possibly copyvio from some commercial enterprise, and hasn't contributed to Wikivoyage in the last year. '''Delete.''' [[User:Ground Zero|Ground Zero]] ([[User talk:Ground Zero|talk]]) 13:37, 10 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | |||
:See [[Talk:Salerno, Paestum and Amalfi#Copy of Votes for deletion thread]], closed a year ago, with nobody satisfied with the article as such, but with differing opinions on how to proceed. After closure, the article was cut down to what belongs in an itinerary article, but nobody has taken an interest in developing it and there is little hope the original author will. The page should probably be deleted as a useless personal itinerary, unless content was copied to other articles, in which case it should be redirected to the region. –[[User:LPfi|LPfi]] ([[User talk:LPfi|talk]]) 14:23, 10 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | |||
*'''Delete''' per |
*'''Delete''' per the 1-year rule, or at most, merge to [[Salerno#Go next]] as a suggestion of 2 places to visit from there, but that doesn't seem necessary. [[User:Ikan Kekek|Ikan Kekek]] ([[User talk:Ikan Kekek|talk]]) 15:58, 10 December 2024 (UTC) |
||
::I just checked the histories of the [[Salerno]], [[Paestum]] and [[Amalfi]] articles, and so far, no content has been merged from this embryonic itinerary article to any of those articles, so at this point, it wouldn't be necessary to keep the title as a redirect. [[User:Ikan Kekek|Ikan Kekek]] ([[User talk:Ikan Kekek|talk]]) 16:55, 10 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Rename & Redirect''' This one had some absolutely breathtaking photos on Commons and I didn't know [[Réunion]] even existed before this Vfd, so since it taught me something new, I didn't have the heart to let it's sandy little head lay on the chopping block. It seems to be that the most productive course of action is to rename the page to [[Petite-Île]] ''without'' leaving a redirect to the current name. However in the spirit of honoring the work of the original author, I think a redirect ''should'' be made for [[Grande Anse Beach]] (or Bay, if the preference here goes to naming pages for geographical features over attractions) to Petite-Île. I know my little bit of tinkering left it far from ship-shape and Bristol fashion, but I was mindful to address the stated concerns of the nomination. I do believe it is now integrated, has a page banner and as in the previous case, another grain of sand in the oyster for a future editor. <span style="white-space: nowrap;">'''—''' <span style="background-color: #000; border: 1px solid #000; border-radius: 8px 0 0 8px; padding: 2px 4px;">[[User:RogueScholar|<span style="color: #ffa228 !important; font-weight: 500;">🐈'''ℛ'''ogueScholar</span>]]</span><span style="background-color: #ffa228; border: 1px solid #000; border-radius: 0 8px 8px 0; padding: 2px 4px;">[[User talk:RogueScholar|<span style="color: #000 !important; font-weight: 700;">🗨''₨Talk''</span>]]</span> <small><span style="background-color: #8fffcd; border-radius: 8px; padding: 2px;">[[Special:Contributions/RogueScholar|<span style="color: #250d78 !important;">(My recent mischief)</span>]]</span></small></span> 14:05, 3 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::In that case, '''delete'''. [[User:LPfi|LPfi]] ([[User talk:LPfi|talk]]) 18:56, 10 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' per the 1-year rule. Any chance this might've been created by a Lucky04 sockpuppet? It very much reads like it. --<span style="font-family:BlinkMacSystemFont; font-size: 14px">[[User:SHB2000|<span style="color:#0b6487">SHB2000</span>]] <small>([[User talk:SHB2000|t]] | [[Special:Contributions/SHB2000|c]] | [[m:User:SHB2000|m]])</small></span> 22:36, 10 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | *: |
||
⚫ | |||
*::Hmm, yeah, true – I don't remember Luchy working on southern Italy from memory. {{ping|A09}}, your thoughts on whether this is a Luchy sock or not? --<span style="font-family:BlinkMacSystemFont; font-size: 14px">[[User:SHB2000|<span style="color:#0b6487">SHB2000</span>]] <small>([[User talk:SHB2000|t]] | [[Special:Contributions/SHB2000|c]] | [[m:User:SHB2000|m]])</small></span> 06:29, 11 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:::Not a match from my perspective. Wrong region, no immediate abuse of machine translations, and different prose style. I’m indifferent to whether delete this article or not. '''[[User:A09|<span style="color:#004d99">A09</span>]]'''<nowiki>|</nowiki>[[User talk:A09|<span style="color:#004d99">(talk)</span>]] 06:49, 11 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::::Sweet, good to know. --<span style="font-family:BlinkMacSystemFont; font-size: 14px">[[User:SHB2000|<span style="color:#0b6487">SHB2000</span>]] <small>([[User talk:SHB2000|t]] | [[Special:Contributions/SHB2000|c]] | [[m:User:SHB2000|m]])</small></span> 07:04, 11 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
=== [[Zhucheng]] === |
|||
==November 2024== |
|||
===[[Karakalpak phrasebook]]=== |
|||
I've given [[User:Dongtingchun]] 10 days' notice on their [[User talk:Dongtingchun|user talk page]] that this non-Wikivoyage-[[style]] presumably [[copyvio]] stub would be nominated for deletion, so I duly nominate it. If I knew where it was copied from, I would have summarily deleted it, but I don't think there will be any keep votes for this. Of course a real article about this city would be welcome. [[User:Ikan Kekek|Ikan Kekek]] ([[User talk:Ikan Kekek|talk]]) 07:29, 12 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | *'''Speedy delete''' – this isn't even an article; I would more or less speedy delete this as it is entirely [[WV:CSD|out of scope]]. --<span style="font-family:BlinkMacSystemFont; font-size: 14px">[[User:SHB2000|<span style="color:#0b6487">SHB2000</span>]] <small>([[User talk:SHB2000|t]] | [[Special:Contributions/SHB2000|c]] | [[m:User:SHB2000|m]])</small></span> 08:20, 12 December 2024 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | |||
*::It has potential, but definitely not in the way it currently stands which is content that belongs on Wikipedia, not here; I think it's more or less better for anyone to just start the article from scratch than work with this where we don't even know if it's a copyvio or not. --<span style="font-family:BlinkMacSystemFont; font-size: 14px">[[User:SHB2000|<span style="color:#0b6487">SHB2000</span>]] <small>([[User talk:SHB2000|t]] | [[Special:Contributions/SHB2000|c]] | [[m:User:SHB2000|m]])</small></span> 09:08, 12 December 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:08, 12 December 2024
Votes for deletion
This page lists articles, files and templates that are nominated for deletion. Any Wikivoyager can make a nomination or comment on any nomination. Nominations or comments should follow a rationale based on our deletion policy. If our deletion policy leads towards a merge or redirect, then coordinate this on the discussion page of the article. The purpose of this page is limited to the interpretation and application of our deletion policy. You can discuss what our deletion policies should be on the deletion policy discussion page. NominatingAdd a {{vfd}} tag to the top of the article, file or template being proposed for deletion, so that people viewing it will be aware. Place the tag at the very top, before everything else, except the page banner. Do note though, if you're tagging a template for deletion, use <noinclude>{{vfd}}</noinclude> instead of {{vfd}} alone. Add a link to the article, file or template at the end of the list below, along with the reason why it is being listed for deletion. Sign your recommendation using four tildes ("~~~~"). If you're nominating a file for deletion, make sure it's actually hosted on the English Wikivoyage and not on Wikimedia Commons. The basic format for a deletion nomination is: ===[[Chicken]]=== Not a valid travel article topic. ~~~~ CommentingAll Wikivoyagers are invited to comment on articles, files or templates listed for deletion. The format for comments is: ===[[Chicken]]=== * '''Delete'''. Not a valid travel article topic. TravelNut 25:25, 31 Feb 2525 (UTC) * '''Keep'''. There is a town in [[Alaska]] called Chicken. ~~~~ When leaving comments you may elect to delete, keep, or redirect the article. If you recommend redirection, you may suggest where it should be redirected to. Any attempt to merge content from an article to some other destination must retain the edit history to comply with the attribution (CC BY-SA) requirements of the free license, so it may be possible to merge and redirect but not to merge and delete. Sign your comment using four tildes ("~~~~"). Deleting, or not
ArchivingAfter you keep/redirect/merge/delete the article, file or template, move the deletion discussion to the Archives page for the appropriate month. The root archives page has a directory. Note that it's the month in which the action was taken, rather than when the nomination was first posted, that should be used for the archived discussion; that way, recourse to the deletion log can lead subsequent readers right to the discussion (at least for the pages that were deleted). When archiving, always make it clear to other editors what the outcome of the discussion was. First, describe the outcome in the edit summary when you remove the discussion, with something like "archive as kept". Then add a line for the result to the discussion on the archive page. If the nominated article, file or template was not deleted, then the nomination should be mentioned on its talk page. Generally this is done by providing a link to the deletion discussion on the talk page. One should also indicate the result on the talk page. If the discussion is short, an alternative is to place an (identical duplicate) copy of the discussion on the talk page. See also:
|
December 2024
Seems like obvious copyvio from Wikipedia, although I'm not immediately finding it at en.wikipedia. But it's certainly a stub that's in a totally non-Wikivoyage style and has text copied from somewhere, without any acknowledgement. I attempted to engage the article-starter on User talk:OrkanWładysław, but there has as yet been no response. I would have summarily deleted this article without a nomination if I had found the source of the text. Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:28, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- I can't find the source of this either. However it is a dump of text that is likely to have been machine translated from a document that is not available online. Unless someone wants to take a chainsaw to it and turn it into a Wikivoyage article, it think we should delete it to be on the safe side of our copyvio policy. Ground Zero (talk) 12:20, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Given the nature of it, it's better to nuke it and start this article afresh if someone is willing to make this a proper viable travel article. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 12:32, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
Not an itinerary. No edits for more than a year. Badly formatted. No information that isn't already in the articles for the three cities listed. The article's creator added a bunch of text that was possibly copyvio from some commercial enterprise, and hasn't contributed to Wikivoyage in the last year. Delete. Ground Zero (talk) 13:37, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- See Talk:Salerno, Paestum and Amalfi#Copy of Votes for deletion thread, closed a year ago, with nobody satisfied with the article as such, but with differing opinions on how to proceed. After closure, the article was cut down to what belongs in an itinerary article, but nobody has taken an interest in developing it and there is little hope the original author will. The page should probably be deleted as a useless personal itinerary, unless content was copied to other articles, in which case it should be redirected to the region. –LPfi (talk) 14:23, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per the 1-year rule, or at most, merge to Salerno#Go next as a suggestion of 2 places to visit from there, but that doesn't seem necessary. Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:58, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- I just checked the histories of the Salerno, Paestum and Amalfi articles, and so far, no content has been merged from this embryonic itinerary article to any of those articles, so at this point, it wouldn't be necessary to keep the title as a redirect. Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:55, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- In that case, delete. LPfi (talk) 18:56, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- I just checked the histories of the Salerno, Paestum and Amalfi articles, and so far, no content has been merged from this embryonic itinerary article to any of those articles, so at this point, it wouldn't be necessary to keep the title as a redirect. Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:55, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per the 1-year rule. Any chance this might've been created by a Lucky04 sockpuppet? It very much reads like it. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 22:36, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Wrong region of Italy and more combative, too, I think. Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:28, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hmm, yeah, true – I don't remember Luchy working on southern Italy from memory. @A09:, your thoughts on whether this is a Luchy sock or not? --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 06:29, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not a match from my perspective. Wrong region, no immediate abuse of machine translations, and different prose style. I’m indifferent to whether delete this article or not. A09|(talk) 06:49, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Sweet, good to know. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 07:04, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not a match from my perspective. Wrong region, no immediate abuse of machine translations, and different prose style. I’m indifferent to whether delete this article or not. A09|(talk) 06:49, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hmm, yeah, true – I don't remember Luchy working on southern Italy from memory. @A09:, your thoughts on whether this is a Luchy sock or not? --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 06:29, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Wrong region of Italy and more combative, too, I think. Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:28, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
I've given User:Dongtingchun 10 days' notice on their user talk page that this non-Wikivoyage-style presumably copyvio stub would be nominated for deletion, so I duly nominate it. If I knew where it was copied from, I would have summarily deleted it, but I don't think there will be any keep votes for this. Of course a real article about this city would be welcome. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:29, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete – this isn't even an article; I would more or less speedy delete this as it is entirely out of scope. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 08:20, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- It's for a city of over a million, just a totally wrong format and style for a Wikivoyage article and presumably copied and pasted from somewhere. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:06, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- It has potential, but definitely not in the way it currently stands which is content that belongs on Wikipedia, not here; I think it's more or less better for anyone to just start the article from scratch than work with this where we don't even know if it's a copyvio or not. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 09:08, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- It's for a city of over a million, just a totally wrong format and style for a Wikivoyage article and presumably copied and pasted from somewhere. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:06, 12 December 2024 (UTC)