Word formation
Creation of new lexemes or the process of changing words From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In linguistics, word formation is an ambiguous term[1] that can refer to either:
- the processes through which words can change[2] (i.e. morphology), or
- the creation of new lexemes in a particular language
Morphological
A common method of word formation is the attachment of inflectional or derivational affixes.
Derivation
Examples include:
- the words governor, government, governable, misgovern, ex-governor, and ungovernable are all derived from the base word (to) govern[3]
Inflection
Inflection is modifying a word for the purpose of fitting it into the grammatical structure of a sentence.[4] For example:
Nonmorphological
Summarize
Perspective
Abbreviation
Examples includes:
- etc. from et cetera
Acronyms & Initialisms
An acronym is a word formed from the first letters of other words.[6] For example:
- NASA is the acronym for National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- IJAL (pronounced /aidʒæl/) is the acronym for International Journal of American Linguistics
Acronyms are usually written entirely in capital letters, though some words originating as acronyms, like radar, are now treated as common nouns.[7]
Initialisms are similar to acronyms, but where the letters are pronounced as a series of letters. For example:
Back-formation
In linguistics, back-formation is the process of forming a new word by removing actual affixes, or parts of the word that is re-analyzed as an affix, from other words to create a base.[5] Examples include:
- the verb headhunt is a back-formation of headhunter
- the verb edit is formed from the noun editor[5]
- the word televise is a back-formation of television
The process is motivated by analogy: edit is to editor as act is to actor. This process leads to a lot of denominal verbs.
The productivity of back-formation is limited, with the most productive forms of back-formation being hypocoristics.[5]
Blending
A lexical blend is a complex word typically made of two word fragments. For example:
- smog is a blend of smoke and fog
- brunch is a blend of breakfast and lunch.[6]
- stagflation is a blend of stagnation and inflation[1]
- chunnel is a blend of channel and tunnel,[1] referring to the Channel Tunnel
Although blending is listed under the Nonmorphological heading, there are debates as to how far blending is a matter of morphology.[1]
Compounding
Compounding is the processing of combining two bases, where each base may be a fully-fledged word. For example:
- desktop is formed by combining desk and top
- railway is formed by combining rail and way
- firefighter is formed by combining fire and fighter[5]
Compounding is a topic relevant to syntax, semantics, and morphology.[2]
Hashtagging as word formation
Linguists argue that hashtags are words and hashtagging is a morphological process.[8][9] Social media users view the syntax of existing viral hashtags as guiding principles for creating new ones. A hashtag's popularity is therefore influenced more by the presence of popular hashtags with similar syntactic patterns than by its conciseness and clarity.[10]
Word formation vs. semantic change
There are processes for forming new dictionary items which are not considered under the umbrella of word formation.[1] One specific example is semantic change, which is a change in a single word's meaning. The boundary between word formation and semantic change can be difficult to define as a new use of an old word can be seen as a new word derived from an old one and identical to it in form.
See also
References
Wikiwand - on
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.