Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Social and Information Networks

arXiv:1202.5713 (cs)
[Submitted on 26 Feb 2012]

Title:The warm-start bias of Yelp ratings

Authors:Michalis Potamias
View PDF
Abstract:Yelp ratings are often viewed as a reputation metric for local businesses. In this paper we study how Yelp ratings evolve over time. Our main finding is that on average the first ratings that businesses receive overestimate their eventual reputation. In particular, the first review that a business receives in our dataset averages 4.1 stars, while the 20th review averages just 3.69 stars. This significant warm-start bias which may be attributed to the limited exposure of a business in its first steps may mask analysis performed on ratings and reputational ramifications. Therefore, we study techniques to identify and correct for this bias. Further, we perform a case study to explore the effect of a Groupon deal on the merchant's subsequent ratings and show both that previous research has overestimated Groupon's effect to merchants' reputation and that average ratings anticorrelate with the number of reviews received. Our analysis points to the importance of identifying and removing biases from Yelp reviews.
Comments: 5 pages, 5 figures
Subjects: Social and Information Networks (cs.SI)
Cite as: arXiv:1202.5713 [cs.SI]
  (or arXiv:1202.5713v1 [cs.SI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1202.5713

Submission history

From: Michalis Potamias [view email]
[v1] Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:42:57 UTC (46 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

view license
Current browse context:
cs
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2012-02
Change to browse by:
cs.SI

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Michalis Potamias
export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)