Gaussian distribution techniques

Multiple linear regression is strictly a parametric supervised learning technique. A parametric technique is one which assumes that the variables conform to some distribution (often the Gaussian distribution) the properties of the distribution are assumed in the underlying statistical method. A non-parametric technique does not rely upon the assumption of any particular distribution. A supervised learning method is one which uses information about the dependent variable to derive the model. An unsupervised learning method does not. Thus cluster analysis, principal components analysis and factor analysis are all examples of unsupervised learning techniques. [Pg.719]

As an example of these techniques, we shall calculate the characteristic function of the gaussian distribution with zero mean and unit variance and then use it to calculate moments. Starting from the definition of the characteristic function, we obtain18 ... [Pg.127]

If basic assumptions concerning the error structure are incorrect (e.g., non-Gaussian distribution) or cannot be specified, more robust estimation techniques may be necessary. In addition to the above considerations, it is often important to introduce constraints on the estimated parameters (e.g., the parameters can only be positive). Such constraints are included in the simulation and parameter estimation package SIMUSOLV. Beeause of numerical inaccuracy, scaling of parameters and data may be necessary if the numerical values are of greatly differing order. Plots of the residuals, difference between model and measurement value, are very useful in identifying systematic or model errors. [Pg.114]

In both examples discussed in this section, the second-order approximation to AA turned out to be satisfactory. We, however, do not want to leave the reader with the impression that this is always true. If this were the case, it would imply that probability distributions of interest were always Gaussian. Statistical mechanics would then be a much simpler field. Since this is obviously not so, we have to develop techniques to deal with large and not necessarily Gaussian-distributed perturbations. This issue is addressed in the remainder of this chapter. [Pg.46]

In Sect. 7.4.6, we discussed various stochastic simulation techniques that include the kinetics of recombination and free-ion yield in multiple ion-pair spurs. No further details will be presented here, but the results will be compared with available experiments. In so doing, we should remember that in the more comprehensive Monte Carlo simulations of Bartczak and Hummel (1986,1987, 1993,1997) Hummel and Bartczak, (1988) the recombination reaction is taken to be fully diffusion-controlled and that the diffusive free path distribution is frequently assumed to be rectangular, consistent with the diffusion coefficient, instead of a more realistic distribution. While the latter assumption can be justified on the basis of the central limit theorem, which guarantees a gaussian distribution for a large number of scatterings, the first assumption is only valid for low-mobility liquids. [Pg.300]

Subsequent work by Gardiner et al. showed that in a relatively complex mixture like human serum, the association between a metal and protein or ligand could be said to have been established when their Gaussian distribution coincide. This is more likely to be true if the elution volumes of the constituents are in the fractionation range rather than in the excluded volume. Examples of the usefulness of immunological techniques as an aid in identification of proteins are given. Necessary clean-up procedures are also suggested. [Pg.157]

Equation (c) breaks down when A(co) => which is the case for instance with the Gaussian distribution. Then values of time over a range can be tried until the results of integration of Equation (b) assume a constant value. This technique is applied In problems P5.07.04, P5.07.14 and P5.07.15. [Pg.500]

All measurements are accompanied by a certain amount of error, and an estimate of its magnitude is necessary to validate results. The error cannot be eliminated completely, although its magnitude and nature can be characterized. It can also be reduced with improved techniques. In general, errors can be classified as random and systematic. If the same experiment is repeated several times, the individual measurements cluster around the mean value. The differences are due to unknown factors that are stochastic in nature and are termed random errors. They have a Gaussian distribution and equal probability of being above or below the mean. On the other hand, systematic errors tend to bias the measurements in one direction. Systematic error is measured as the deviation from the true value. [Pg.6]

This results in a Gaussian distribution centered on vx = 0, shown in Figure 3. la. In most vapor deposition techniques, it is the speed rather than the velocity that we... [Pg.106]

Nonlinear optimization techniques have been applied to determine isotherm parameters. It is well known (Ncibi, 2008) that the use of linear expressions, obtained by transformation of nonlinear one, distorts the experimental error by creating an inherent error estimation problem. In fact, the linear analysis method assumes that (i) the scatter of points follows a Gaussian distribution and (ii) the error distribution is the same at every value of the equilibrium liquid-phase concentration. Such behavior is not exhibited by equilibrium isotherm models since they have nonlinear shape for this reason the error distribution gets altered after transforming the data... [Pg.21]

Fig. 8.6 Features of the double-pulse technique Model on the influence of the transition moment between nucleation pulse and growth pulse in the course of the double-pulse deposition on the Gaussian particle distribution formed after the nucleation pulse [29] (a) Gaussian particle distribution of N nuclei with radii r > tcr (T)i) for different over potentials of the first pulse ( t ib << t iAl)- The hatched area of the Gaussian distribution corresponds to the number of stable particles with radii r > rcr (tje). whereas the white area of particles of under critical size is amputated as these particles dissolve, (b) Representation of the result of the particle cut off, small (dark) particles dissolve but larger particles (white) survive under the lower overvoltage of the growth pulse.(c) If a small particle lies in the diffusion zone of a larger particle the under saturation can favor the dissolution of the smaller ones...

The selected points have to be obtained by careful sampling using a modified Monte Carlo technique. The FSGO function is chosen for the electron density, because it can be optimized to get the best result. The Gaussian distribution with standard deviation cr is taken. [Pg.300]

Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...