Molecular weight differences

All have molecular weights of 226 to the nearest integer (C = 12, H = 1, S = 32), but the exact molecular weights differ slightly. A resolution of 2500 is necessary to separate molecules 1, 2 and 3 but 75,000 is required to separate molecule 4 from molecule 3 which explains why high resolution mass spectrometers are sdiiglit. [Pg.49]

No consideration is made of the fact that S and H contribute to M a molecular weight different from Mq. [Pg.33]

Use the rating selection charts or tables as per catalog instructions. For specific gravity or molecular weight different than the charts or tables, a correc-don factor is usually designated and should be used. [Pg.258]

Calculation of ID using biological monitoring techniques requires the knowledge of the pharmacokinetics of the parent pesticide in laboratory animals. This will allow the use of the parent or its urine metabolite(s) to calculate the total amount of the parent that had been absorbed through the skin of the test subject. The amount of the residue in the urine should be corrected for any molecular weight differences between the parent and its urine metabolite(s) and also corrected for daily urine excretion volumes based on creatinine analysis of the urine samples. [Pg.1021]

Synthetics are made up of polymers—natural or synthetic compounds of high molecular weight. Different polymeric materials may be used in the construction of FMLs26,27 ... [Pg.1119]

Quantitative data for the 3,5,6-TCP and 13C2-3,5,6-TCP were obtained by selected ion monitoring of the dichloropyridinol fragment ions (m/z 161 to 165 0.1 sec/scan). The amount of TCP found in the urine was used to calculate the amount of chlorpyrifos represented by that amount of TCP based on molecular weight differences. [Pg.55]

However, certain contradictions can be seen from the data of Tables 1 and 2. Indeed, the molecular weights determined for aqueous solutions of these p- and s-fraclions in the SEC experiments (Table 1) coincided well with the results of light scattering for DMSO solutions (Table 2) but why did the molecular weights differ so considerably from the light scattering data (Table 2) for the solutions of given copolymers in pure water, where, in... [Pg.126]

Pharmaceutical production generally uses multipurpose equipment, and so entrapment behind a membrane would require significant capital expenditure on specialized equipment. In spite of this, the use of membrane reactors in biocatalysis represents an efficient method of enzyme immobilization, given the large molecular weight difference between enzymes (10-150 kDa) and most substrates (300-500 Da). The reader is referred to some recent reviews on the topic. [Pg.64]

Dilatometric technique can also be used for determination of polymerization rate in the case of multimonomer polymerization. However, in this case calibration of the dilatometric method is more complex. The substrates and products are both polymers with similar molecular weights. Difference in density during the course of polymerization is connected only with the conversion of double bonds to the single bonds. It is difficult to obtain a macromolecular product in which double bonds are fully converted to single bonds. Calibration must be based on simultaneous measurements of Ah and independent method (e.g., IR spectroscopy) and calculation of (1/dp l/d]vi). [Pg.136]

As described before, TLC separation based on the phase-separation mechanism causes fractionation primarily by molecular-weight differences. The resolution attained by this mechanism in TLC will be discussed below by comparing it with those attained by GPC and velocity ultracentrifugation. To this end, some findings obtained by Miyamoto etal. during the course of a study on TLC separation of star-shaped polystyrenes96 97) are referred to. [Pg.222]

Despite the technical problems in the latter film study, we conclude that there is no intramolecular excimer formation in the compounds of Richards et al.143, and probably little intermolecular excimer formation in the pure films. The absence of an effect of solvent power 25) on the possible excimer fluorescence of the R = CH3 polymer may not be significant, since little change in the coil dimensions would be expected for the short ( 300 backbone atoms) polymers 143> which were studied. Additional work is needed on the fluorescence of such polymers having higher molecular weights, different aryl substituents (R = 2-naphthyl, for example), and fewer adventitious impurities. [Pg.59]

Thus, the available theories are consistent with the observation that Me < Mc < Mc. There is certainly no justification for the view sometime expressed that the characteristic molecular weights differ because different types of entanglements are responsible for the properties concerned. [Pg.97]

The resins A, B, and C all apparently occur in relatively narrow molecular weight ranges if one neglects the very low molecular weight water-soluble components. The ranges are A (2500), B (4000), and C (8000). The initial polymerizations were designed to produce relative molecular weight differences of this type. [Pg.211]

The numerical data of the analysis are summarized in Table 1. Although the molecular weights differ by a factor of about 200, the results are rather similar. [Pg.165]

Some problems with FCS technology concern the fluorescent label. Data collection is possible only if the label does not interfere with the structure of the labeled molecule or the binding of the target to the ap tamer. Also, the label should be site-specific, because molecules that are labeled at different positions may have different binding properties. Another problem concerns the molecular weight difference between the free and complexed molecule, which should be sufficient for... [Pg.78]

Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...