Surfactant components

If two pure, immiscible liquids, such as benzene and water, are vigorously shaken together, they will form a dispersion, but it is doubtful that one phase or the other will be uniquely continuous or dispersed. On stopping the agitation, phase separation occurs so quickly that it is questionable whether the term emulsion really should be applied to the system. A surfactant component is generally needed to obtain a stable or reasonably stable emulsion. Thus, if a little soap is added to the benzene-water system, the result on shaking is a true emulsion that separates out only very slowly. Theories of... [Pg.503]

A foam can be considered as a type of emulsion in which the inner phase is a gas, and as with emulsions, it seems necessary to have some surfactant component present to give stability. The resemblance is particularly close in the case of foams consisting of nearly spherical bubbles separated by rather thick liquid films such foams have been given the name kugelschaum by Manegold [175]. [Pg.519]

In some cases the performance optimization of binary and ternary mixed active systems is well documented, and it is clear from the performance synergy as to why a certain combination is used. However, in recent years mixed active formulations have become more complicated, containing up to five or six surfactant components. In these cases the performance benefits of a particular mixed active system are less well defined to anyone but the actual producer of that product. [Pg.127]

FIG. 24 Effect of partial replacement of linear alkylbenzesulfonate by a-olefinsulfonate (AOS) in surfactant component of carbonate-built product formulation on detergency of polyester-cotton (50 50 blend). (From Ref. 3.)... [Pg.421]

Thus, the enhancement of heat transfer may be connected to the decrease in the surface tension value at low surfactant concentration. In such a system of coordinates, the effect of the surface tension on excess heat transfer (/z — /zw)/ (/ max — w) may be presented as the linear fit of the value C/Cq. On the other hand, the decrease in heat transfer at higher surfactant concentration may be related to the increased viscosity. Unfortunately, we did not find surfactant viscosity data in the other studies. However, we can assume that the effect of viscosity on heat transfer at surfactant boiling becomes negligible at low concentration of surfactant only. The surface tension of a rapidly extending interface in surfactant solution may be different from the static value, because the surfactant component cannot diffuse to the absorber layer promptly. This may result in an interfacial flow driven by the surface tension gradi-... [Pg.72]

Depending upon the physical properties of a surfactant (component), removal from the mixed liquor is further possible through precipitation of insoluble salts and adsorption onto solids or bacterial floes, which, in turn, are subsequently withdrawn with the excess sludge [53]. In particular, intact or partly degraded low water-soluble surfactants are eliminated by this route. [Pg.67]

The formation of mixed micelles in surfactant solutions which contain two or more surfactant components can be significantly affected by the structures of the surfactants involved. The observed critical micelle concentration (cmc) is often significantly lower than would be expected based on the erne s of the pure surfactants. This clearly demonstrates that interactions between different surfactant components in the mixed micelles are taking place. [Pg.141]

Calorimetric measurements can be used to obtain heats of mixing between different surfactant components in nonideal mixed micelles and assess the effects of surfactant structure on the thermodynamics of mixed micellization. Calorimetry can also be successfully applied in measuring the erne s of nonideal mixed surfactant systems. The results of such measurements show that alkyl ethoxylate sulfate surfactants exhibit smaller deviations from ideality and interact significantly less strongly with alkyl ethoxylate nonionics than alkyl sulfates. [Pg.150]

These are present in an immiscible two-phase system (0 and W denoting oil and water, respectively) containing a third-surfactant component with partial solubility in both bulk phases. Each surfactant molecule has a hydrophilic (denoted by H) and a lipophilic (denoted by L) section. Conceptually then Winsor views all the possible molecular interactions in such a system in terms of their cohesive energy (denoted by C). For such a system, there are then 10 possible cohesive molecular interactions (i.e., 10 unique combinations of the letters 0, W, H, and L). In the ideal case, the lipophile-oil and the hydrophile-water interaction will be the predominant interactions. The relative magnitude (R) of these two interactions... [Pg.258]

For the surfactant components, similar equations relating the partial molar fraction and the activity coefficient with the surface tension can be estab-... [Pg.28]

Surfactants used in practical applications essentially always consist of a mixture of surface-active compounds. Isomerically pure surfactants are often expensive to produce and generally have only a small potential advantage in performance over the less expensive surfactant mixtures. In many applications, mixtures of dissimilar surfactants can have superior properties to those of the individual surfactant components involved. These synergistic properties of surfactant mixtures have provided impetus for much of the research on interactions between surfactants. [Pg.3]

Monomer—Micelle Equilibria. The distribution of surfactant components between micelles and monomeric state in aqueous solutions depends on surfactant structures as well as on overall solution composition. For example, for a binary system of surfactants A and B in solution, the micelle may contain SO mole % A/SO X B while the monomer may be 90 /. A/10 X B. Since either the monomer or the micelle composition may be crucial to behavior of the system, the ability to predict the relative distribution of surfactant components between monomer and micelle, given the overall solution composition, is an important one. [Pg.5]

Except for some anionic/cationic surfactant mixtures which form ion pairs, in a typical surfactant solution, the concentration of the surfactant components as monomeric species is so dilute that no significant interactions between surfactant monomers occur. Therefore, the monomer—mi celle equilibria is dictated by the tendency of the surfactant components to form micelles and the interaction between surfactants in the micelle. Prediction of monomer—micelle equilibria reduces to modeling of the thermodynamics of mixed micelle formation. [Pg.5]

As seen in Table I, For the ideal system, the values oF Cn are between the CMC values oF the two pure surFactant components. However, the systems showing... [Pg.10]

Nishikido (21) has done a systematic study o-f mixed sur-factant solubilization. In that study, solubilization in mixed systems was compared to that predicted by application o-f a linear mixing rule to the solubilizations in the pure surfactant component micelles. For example, in this "ideal case, a micelle composed of a 50/50 molar mixture of two surfactants would have a solubilization capacity which is an average of that of the two pure surfactants involved. A system showing negative deviation from ideality would have less solubilization than this ideal system a system having positive deviation from ideality would have more. [Pg.17]

When two similarly structured anionic surfactants adsorb on minerals, the mixed admicelle approximately obeys ideal solution theory (jUL - Below the CMC, the total adsorption at any total surfactant concentration is intermediate between the pure component adsorption levels. Adsorption of each surfactant component in these systems can be easily predicted from pure component adsorption isotherms by combining ideal solution theory with an empirical correspond ng states theory approach (Z3). ... [Pg.19]

In the case of non—eutectic systems, the solid phase shows nearly ideal mixing, so that the surfactant components distribute themselves between the micelle and the solid in about the same relative proportions (i.e., both the mixed micelle and mixed solid are approximately ideal). However, in the case of the eutectic type system, the crystal is extremely non-ideal (almost a single component), while the micelle has nearly ideal mixing. As seen in earlier calculations for ideal systems, even though the total surfactant monomer concentration is intermediate between that of the pure components, the monomer concentration of an individual component decreases as its total proportion in solution decreases. As the proportion of surfactant A decreases in solution (proportion of surfactant B increases) from pure A, there is a lower monomer concentration of A. Therefore, it requires a lower temperature or a higher added electrolyte level to precipitate it. At some... [Pg.21]

The equilibrium in these systems above the cloud point then involves monomer-micelle equilibrium in the dilute phase and monomer in the dilute phase in equilibrium with the coacervate phase. Prediction o-f the distribution of surfactant component between phases involves modeling of both of these equilibrium processes (98). It should be kept in mind that the region under discussion here involves only a small fraction of the total phase space in the nonionic surfactant—water system (105). Other compositions may involve more than two equilibrium phases, liquid crystals, or other structures. As the temperature or surfactant composition or concentration is varied, these regions may be encroached upon, something that the surfactant technologist must be wary of when working with nonionic surfactant systems. [Pg.24]

Using this approach, a model can be developed by considering the chemical potentials of the individual surfactant components. Here, we consider only the region where the adsorbed monolayer is "saturated" with surfactant (for example, at or above the cmc) and where no "bulk-like" water is present at the interface. Under these conditions the sum of the surface mole fractions of surfactant is assumed to equal unity. This approach diverges from standard treatments of adsorption at interfaces (see ref 28) in that the solvent is not explicitly Included in the treatment. While the "residual" solvent at the interface can clearly effect the surface free energy of the system, we now consider these effects to be accounted for in the standard chemical potentials at the surface and in the nonideal net interaction parameter in the mixed pseudo-phase. [Pg.104]

With these considerations in mind, the chemical potential of the ith free monomeric surfactant component in solution is given by... [Pg.104]

The micellization of the surfactant in an aqueous solution can be regarded as a phase separation process (4,12). At equilibrium, the chemical potential of surfactant component i,/tj, is equal to that in the micelle... [Pg.185]

In the systems with considerable molecular interactions between the two surfactant components, such as CgNBr-CyFNa (cationic-anionic) and CsSOC-CrFNa (nonionic-anionic) systems, the "mutual phobic interaction" can be concealed entirely and there are large negative jSg. and /3m values for these systems. [Pg.197]

Scamehorn et. al. (19) reported the adsorption isotherms for a binary mixture of anionic surfactants. A formal adsorption model developed for single surfactant systems ( ) was extended to this binary system and shown to accurately describe the mixed adsorption isotherms (19). That theoretically based model was very complex and is probably not feasible to extend beyond two surfactant components. [Pg.203]

Micelles are often present in surfactant systems. In some processes, such as solubilization, they are directly involved. Micelles indirectly affect many other processes because monomer concentrations or activities of the surfactant components are dictated by the monomer— micelle equilibrium at total surfactant concentrations above the CMC. Therefore, interest in mixed micelle formation will continue to grow. [Pg.325]

As already discussed in Chapter 1, the relative tendency of a surfactant component to adsorb on a given surface or to form micelles can vary greatly with surfactant structure. The adsorption of each component could be measured below the CMC at various concentrations of each surfactant in a mixture. A matrix could be constructed to tabulate the (hopefully unique) monomer concentration of each component in the mixture corresponding to any combination of adsorption levels for the various components present. For example, for a binary system of surfactants A and B, when adsorption of A is 0.5 mmole/g and that of B is 0.3 mmole/g, there should be only one unique combination of monomer concentrations of surfactant A and of surfactant B which would result in this adsorption (e.g., 1 mM of A and 1.5 mM of B). Uell above the CMC, where most of the surfactant in solution is present as micelles, micellar composition is approximately equal to solution composition and is, therefore, known. If individual surfactant component adsorption is also measured here, it would allow computation of each surfactant monomer concentration (from the aforementioned matrix) in equilibrium with the mixed micelles. Other processes dependent on monomer concentration or surfactant component activities only could also be used in a similar fashion to determine monomer—micelle equilibrium. [Pg.326]

To this point, only models based on the pseudo—phase separation model have been discussed. Mixed micelle models utilizing the mass action model may be necessary for micelles with small aggregation numbers, as demonstrated by Kamrath and Franses ( ). However, even for large micelles, the fundamental basis for the pseudophase separation model needs to be examined. In micelles, how much solvent or how many counterions (bound or in the electrical double layer) should be included in the micellar pseudo-phase is unclear. The difficulty is normally surmounted by assuming that the pseudo—phase consists of only the surfactant components i.e., solvent or counterions are ignored. The validity of treating the micelle on a surfactant—oniy basis has not been verified. Funasaki and Hada (22) have questioned the thermodynamic consistency of such an approach. [Pg.328]

Let us consider now the case of a specific ionic polysaccharide. The unique properties of complexes of the cationic chitosan with non-ionic sorbitan esters provides an interesting example. Grant and co-workers (2006) have established that mixtures of chitosan and surfactant form emulsion-like solutions and/or creams, where the surfactant component is present as droplets or micelle-like particles and the chitosan solution acts as the system s continuous phase. It was established that the length and the degree of saturation of the surfactant hydrocarbon chain have a significant impact on the development of the chitosan-surfactant complexes. Moreover, an optimal distance between the chitosan s protonated amine groups is required for effective interactions to occur between the polysaccharide and the sorbitan esters. [Pg.193]

Blend the surfactant components in Part A. Add the components of Part B one at a time to Part A with continuous stirring. [Pg.44]

Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...