View source for File talk:Nuclear power stations.png

{{warning|If you are planning to change the image first show us on here and you '''MUST''' ''show your references''. }}
==Finland==
Is currently wrong. They have both active plants and are building a new plant, check Wikipedia for references. [[User:Hvatum|Hvatum]] 08:16, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

===Some references===
For current nuclear plants in Finland: 

* [http://www.tvo.fi/www/page/voimalaitos_en/ TVO power plant] (in Olkiluoto, Finland)
* [http://www.fortum.com/document.asp?path=14022;14024;14026;14043;36953;36954 Fortum - Finnish nuclear power since 1977] (in Loviisa, Finland)
* [http://www.stuk.fi/ydinturvallisuus/ydinvoimalaitokset/en_GB/ydinvoimalaitokset/ STUK (Finnish Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority) page about nuclear plants in Finland]

For fifth nuclear power plant currently being built next to two other in Olkiluoto:
* [http://www.tvo.fi/www/page/2305/ TVO - OL3] 

I hope these are enough for references about nuclear plants in Finland. --[[User:Igno2|Igno2]] 20:04, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

==Philippines and Austria==
Of all the countries in the world, these two do NOT fit in any of the categories that people have been using.  Austria is further unique in the fact that they COMPLETED a nuclear plant, and then scrapped plans to use it.  These will not fit completely into the "All reactors decommissioned" or "No commercial reactors" and they're certainly not "stable".  However, if you include countries that have had canceled plants you'll see a few light up and have an issue about even more complex status in come cases (i.e. Iran).  

But either way, I don't think it's sufficient or educational to have those two the same gray as the rest of the world. [[User:Theanphibian|Theanphibian]] 02:17, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Please provide References thats all i ask.[[User:Sparrowman980|Sparrowman980]] 00:58, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
:Alright Mr. Reference fever.  My point is that if you have the information, several don't fit into any of the categories that we have there right now.  This isn't a problem with references. [[User:Theanphibian|Theanphibian]] 16:13, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Okay then i will add a status that states canceled plants.[[User:Sparrowman980|Sparrowman980]] 16:21, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
:If you think that would make a better illustration, then go for it.  I'm just trying to make it clear what the situations actually are, beyond that, I won't bother arguing and haggling about categorization. [[User:Theanphibian|Theanphibian]] 16:52, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Please tell me the actual situation. [[User:Sparrowman980|Sparrowman980]] 05:42, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Country
! Plants/situation
|-
| [[Austria]] || Construction on the Zwentendorf Nuclear plant finished in 1978, however a referendum was passed that did not allow startup.
|-
| [[The Philippines]] || 1 plant, the [[:en:Bataan Nuclear Power Plant]], was mothballedfew years after the license is approved and operation is expected between 2013 and 2015.
|} Their category is not completely clear.  Same with Poland. [[User:Theanphibian|Theanphibian]] 05:31, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Okay i will get to work on this and then you can check and see if it right.[[User:Sparrowman980|Sparrowman980]] 01:45, 31 October 2007 (UTC)