Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:NASA’s Webb Reveals Cosmic Cliffs, Glittering Landscape of Star Birth.jpg

File:NASA’s Webb Reveals Cosmic Cliffs, Glittering Landscape of Star Birth.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2022 at 20:12:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:NASA’s Webb Reveals Cosmic Cliffs, Glittering Landscape of Star Birth.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:NASA’s Webb Reveals Cosmic Cliffs, Glittering Landscape of Star Birth.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
•  Info created by NASA, ESA and CSA, uploaded and nominated by Yann (talk)
•  Support Wow, there is! This will certainly stay in history as the first of a long series of wonderful images. -- Yann (talk) 20:12, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- IamMM (talk) 20:25, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Fantastic!--Ermell (talk) 20:48, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment Wouldn't it be better to nominate the lossless png-version which is in the process of becoming an FP on en-Wikipedia? The png is also the version used on most Wikipedias. There is also a tiff-version, even more exact. --Cart (talk) 21:43, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

• No. PNG and TIFF versions are useful as archives, but for display JPEG is much better. TIFF is not "more exact". This JPEG file is created from the TIFF. PNG thumbnails have some issues. Yann (talk) 07:41, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

• Perhaps you should take these issues to the nominator on en-wiki. I'm only the messenger here for what's going on with this image, and we often tend to have the same version as FP across wiki-projects. --Cart (talk) 16:31, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

• I will do. I requested a replacement. Yann (talk) 17:53, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

• English WP FP candidate was the JPEG version (now reverted). All PNG replaced by JPEG. Yann (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

• Thank you very much, Yann and Cart! --Aristeas (talk) 03:51, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Cart JPG is better represented on the current browsers using sRGB --Wilfredor (talk) 21:46, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:04, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:49, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support I take a great interest in space, especially Webb. These images are of much greater detail than most of Hubble's images. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 01:56, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Intriguing picture with an educative description -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:16, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Ivar (talk) 05:41, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:34, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support per other supporters. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:58, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:11, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:07, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Obviously. (I feel the need to read more about how this photo was generated from the camera data, how much is ‘real’ and how much is computative photography ;–). But that’s not important for the voting, in any case it was done very well.) --Aristeas (talk) 12:51, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 13:46, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:33, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Cbrescia (talk) 21:59, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --A.Savin 08:20, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:02, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support--Famberhorst (talk) 04:52, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 14:25, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:24, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Anyone who votes against is a poopyhead PDMagazineCoverUploading (talk) 07:01, 22 July 2022 (UTC)