Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo der Deutschen Verkehrswacht e. V..png: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 18: Line 18:


{{vk}} No reason for deletion — As said by others, the reason for deletion is nonsense (Simple sign logo, without higher threshold of originality, also [[COM:TOO Germany]]), which of course ''doesn't'' imply it would be free of copyrights. In addition to that, I expressively included all given license- & source-related informations and also explicitly mentioned its protected status of a registered word-mark. So what is this all about?
{{vk}} No reason for deletion — As said by others, the reason for deletion is nonsense (Simple sign logo, without higher threshold of originality, also [[COM:TOO Germany]]), which of course ''doesn't'' imply it would be free of copyrights. In addition to that, I expressively included all given license- & source-related informations and also explicitly mentioned its protected status of a registered word-mark. So what is this all about?
:{{vk}} ''Reviewed the file- & change-logs:'' What is this nonsense [[User:Edgar Moebius|Edgar Moebius]]?! First you upload it yourself, put it under CC-4.0 and drop in deletion-request after deletion-request (5x Nomination for deletion!), even a request for speedy deletion. And after someone rightfully removes the redundant NfDs and cleans up your mess, you ''again'' put in another NfD even citing the DPMA (all the while your very first Nomination is still underway, running)? ''What is this all about?'' Do you even understand the Wiki-principles of copyright and alike?
::If something is copyright-protected and even a registered word-mark, that just means, that no-one else can use it legally in commercial and official transactions in similar fashion, legally representing such similar thing. Look up the lawsuit of Apple and the German Coffée-shop Apfelkind and how Apple lost the case when they tried to forbid the business-owner to use anything apple-related.
:Source:
:* 1. https://www.sueddeutsche.de/wirtschaft/markenstreit-cafe-apfelkind-besiegt-apple-1.1784653
:* 2. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/07/apfelkind-cafe-trademark-battle-apple-germany
:* 3. https://www.foxnews.com/tech/family-owned-cafe-battles-apple-over-logo-dispute
:* 4. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2055869/German-cafe-Apfelkind-logo-dispute-Apple.html
:Just saying, had to battle nonsense lawsuits over my own nickname (Smartcom5) by some small Australian tech-firm in the 2000s and previously someone brought me before court in the 90s due to alleged similarity of its own product Smartcom (was a kind of modem). Just because it is claimed, doesn't mean it's actually true and holds any water! --[[User:Smartcom5|<b><font color="red">Smart</font><font color="CCCCCC">com</font><font color="green">5</font></b>]] <sup>([[User talk:Smartcom5|Any thoughts?]])</sup> 00:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:36, 15 January 2024

File:Logo der Deutschen Verkehrswacht e. V..png

{{Löschen}} Begründung -- Urheberrechtlich geschützt // nicht gemeinfrei Edgar Moebius (talk) 13:27, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{Copyvio|Non-free logo}} Edgar Moebius (talk) 13:28, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

non-free logo 213.61.164.90 13:38, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

please agree to deletion Edgar Moebius (talk) 13:42, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedydelete|non-free logo}} 213.61.164.90 13:39, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

please agree to deletion Edgar Moebius (talk) 13:42, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Below COM:TOO for germany. PaterMcFly (talk) 16:42, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Not a reason for deletion, no copyright problem because below COM:TOO Germany. --Rosenzweig τ 08:05, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Not a reason for deletion, but can be replaced by File:Deutsche Verkehrswacht logo.svg --Didym (talk) 01:01, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No reason for deletion — As said by others, the reason for deletion is nonsense (Simple sign logo, without higher threshold of originality, also COM:TOO Germany), which of course doesn't imply it would be free of copyrights. In addition to that, I expressively included all given license- & source-related informations and also explicitly mentioned its protected status of a registered word-mark. So what is this all about?

 Keep Reviewed the file- & change-logs: What is this nonsense Edgar Moebius?! First you upload it yourself, put it under CC-4.0 and drop in deletion-request after deletion-request (5x Nomination for deletion!), even a request for speedy deletion. And after someone rightfully removes the redundant NfDs and cleans up your mess, you again put in another NfD even citing the DPMA (all the while your very first Nomination is still underway, running)? What is this all about? Do you even understand the Wiki-principles of copyright and alike?
If something is copyright-protected and even a registered word-mark, that just means, that no-one else can use it legally in commercial and official transactions in similar fashion, legally representing such similar thing. Look up the lawsuit of Apple and the German Coffée-shop Apfelkind and how Apple lost the case when they tried to forbid the business-owner to use anything apple-related.
Source:
Just saying, had to battle nonsense lawsuits over my own nickname (Smartcom5) by some small Australian tech-firm in the 2000s and previously someone brought me before court in the 90s due to alleged similarity of its own product Smartcom (was a kind of modem). Just because it is claimed, doesn't mean it's actually true and holds any water! --Smartcom5 (Any thoughts?) 00:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Logo_der_Deutschen_Verkehrswacht_e._V..png&oldid=841635881"