Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/04/28: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Krdbot (talk | contribs)
m Bot: Archiving 5 threads from Commons:Deletion requests/2024/04/28
Krdbot (talk | contribs)
m Bot: Archiving 3 threads from Commons:Deletion requests/2024/04/28
 
(26 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Deletion requests/Archive|2024|04|28}}
{{Deletion requests/Archive|2024|04|28}}

{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jane e herondy.png}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jane e herondy.png}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Consecration Of King Sinhala-Prince Vijaya (Detail From The Ajanta Mural Of Cave No 17).jpg.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Consecration Of King Sinhala-Prince Vijaya (Detail From The Ajanta Mural Of Cave No 17).jpg.jpg}}
Line 25: Line 24:
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:3. KALEMEGDANSKI DRUMOVI.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:3. KALEMEGDANSKI DRUMOVI.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Enya at the 2017 GRAMMYS.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Enya at the 2017 GRAMMYS.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Celebración ascenso Real Valladolid 2018.mpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bildschirmabdruck 20240219 203519 One UI Home CENS.png}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bhramanam serial moments 1.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Shiju Abdul Rasheed in 2013.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stadtplatz Vilsbiburg Winter 01.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stadtplatz Vilsbiburg Winter 02.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stadtplatz Vilsbiburg Winter 03.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:People of Bahar 22.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Montgomerie, Hill & Partners.png}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jajajaja.gif}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:British Museum - Room 93 (22994825976).jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Samsung Ridgefield Park, New Jerey.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jessica’s Jean Michel Basquiat 512 Book.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Baldwin Wallace Bold & Gold Festival (51555930759).jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Train PNG.png}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alaus Namai (9835275614).jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Baldwin Wallace Bold & Gold Festival (51556133670).jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:A-Z.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:NB 2.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arriving@aFormula.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Strontium nitride.png}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Das Gold den Vaterland}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arumuganeri swamy.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arumuganeriammann.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arumuganeriswamy.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:NathanKinaru ther.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:NathanKinaru.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tiruchendur Shiva temple.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tiruchenduramman.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Peyanvilai swamy.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jack Punswick.png}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jane jpg..jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:EBOUSTE-CI.png}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:StrengthenForceLogo.png}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ckophyoe.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:"N-word pass" graffiti in a public restroom stall.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tokyo IMG 0879 (6225200476).jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Enciclope03}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Saeedalnajjarwiki}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Garvit Gupta.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rangiya metropolis Collage.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arumuganeriamman.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tokyo IMG 0912 (6225249456).jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:CARROT.png}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Eliana de Lima.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Laure Sainclair in La Ruée vers Laure (1996).jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Makoto Hatori Embracing Non-Color and Tradition in Artistic Evolution.pdf}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Mwakwe256}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Dumpygibed}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Maps of Cold War II}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Bertobarc90}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Andrei Tupolev square (Kazan)}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Playa Copacabana Rio de Janeiro Brasil - panoramio (6).jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jane Bunford Photograph.png}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by WijWijs}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:2021 storming of the United States Capitol DSC09170 (50826699171).jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Shirakawahachiman.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Steph Ryan MP.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Blason Fr Beenen.webp}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tokyo IMG 0911 (6224719615).jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jamesbond.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Max and Harvey.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sino-US 2.png}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sino-US.png}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Двоен бета-распад .png}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Skica na jonizaciska komora.png}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jonizaciska energija na neutralni hemiski elementi.png}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alish Mustafayev Isa.png}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alerta de emergencia.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Amber alerts on smasung phone..jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:MIUI Logo as of 16 August 2014.png}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jc 1.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Upplands runinskrifter 1088.png}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Admiralis-generalis-Aladeen}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:P.J. Poston - Peter Poston - Racehorse trainer, Ingatestone. Guardian article by Clement Freud. 1968.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Salomea 2.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Marlon Profuß Letzte Generation (52158652839).jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carrot performing at Chatham central theatre.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Warpani dam maharastra.pdf}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Franz Griessler}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:M S Adiaha address.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Addressing Agricultural Stakeholders by Monday Sunday Adiaha.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Amit Kadel.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gold zerschlächt Eisen. Bringt eurer Gold zur Goldankaufstelle - Jul Diez. LCCN2004665824.tif}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Hello Kitty Märchen Town}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jean Larrieu, capitaine Jedburgh, carte identité BCRAL-1944-recto.JPG}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jean Larrieu, capitaine Jedburgh, carte identité BCRAL-1944-verso.JPG}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Charlotte und Marlon von der Letzten Generation verteilen Flyer am Ende der Friday for Future-Demo. (52380262463).jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yongyuth Wichaidit.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:ทัศนีย์ บูรณุปกรณ์ 2565.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kail Neelum Valley AJK.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Arrowvel}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stanisław Jakubowski.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Воронцова Анна.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Бирон Бенигна.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Виктор Амадей.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Фердинанд IV.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Анна Леопольдовна.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Мария Феодоровна.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Имп Екатерина II.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:David-Kellogg-Lewis.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gérard Louis-Dreyfus in 2015.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Katie Mcgrath 5698018c2c9f4fcc9ed.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Katie McGrath 2022 (cropped).jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lawrence Kansas Palestine rally.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:General Nissage Saget of Haiti.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Roger Broders Monte-Carlo 1930.png}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:GRÊMIO CATANDUVENSE.jpeg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:J.K. Rowling Reads from "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone".webm}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flor Silvestre in Ánimas Trujano.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Photograph of Eugene Stock, 1916.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kaiser-Center-2012.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Marie Chisholm-Burns.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Android 2.2 GT-I5800 2.png}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Everitt cabinet description.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sir Gordon Sutherland.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Larrieu Jean-13RDP-Castres-02.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:13e RDP Larrieu203.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Larrieu Jean, Jedburgh, 1944-09-05 Lyon-03 bis.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jean Larrieu-Croix de guerre avec palme-citation à ordre de l'armée par De Gaulle-20081945-01.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alberto Fujimori.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:El Presidente de Chile Gabriel Boric junto al Primer Ministro de Haití Ariel Henry.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lego Bricks Truck.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:One UI logo, a UI by Samsung (used on Galaxy phones).jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:VR-HOR.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Artwork of early medieval mogadishu3.webp}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nachbarschaftswappen von Woltersdorf-Kietz mit Mantel.png}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:St florian.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wappen der Familie Kreitmaier.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Woltersdorf-Demos Wappen.png}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:สากล ม่วงศิริ.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jeux Interalliés.jpg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pompeiana-Stemma.svg}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Adrien Houngbédji, President of the Beninese National Assembly, March 2019.jpg}}

Latest revision as of 16:45, 6 August 2024

Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 28th, 2024
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrights.? 186.175.83.158 02:41, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Reverse image search shows it elsewhere online pror to uploader's claimed date of creation. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:07, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Iceberg meme CzarJobKhaya (talk) 03:12, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:DW of multiple images, at least several copyrighted, uploader lacks authority to license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Impru20 as no permission (No permission since) Theklan (talk) 07:28, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The license of the image can be seen clearly in the website of the political party this candidate represents: EH Bildu. The license is cc-by-sa (not specificed 3.0 or 4.0) as stated in the footer. Now I can't go back, because the website is poorly designed and doesn't have an archive button, but the image authorship and license is clear from them. Theklan (talk) 07:32, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The image itself is visible here: https://ehbildu.eus/albisteak/eh-bilduren-mahai-politikoak-pello-otxandiano-proposatu-du-lehendakarigai-izateko Theklan (talk) 07:32, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The website's legal note states that "Sólo para uso personal y privado se permite descargar los contenidos, copiar o imprimir cualquier página de esta web. Queda prohibido reproducir, transmitir, modificar o suprimir la información, contenido o advertencias de esta web sin la previa autorización por escrito de EUSKAL HERRIA BILDU." (translates as: "Only for personal and private use it is permitted to download the contents, copy or print any page of this website. It is prohibited to reproduce, transmit, modify or delete the information, content or warnings on this website without the prior written authorization of EUSKAL HERRIA BILDU."). It is not clear what does the footer mean, but it is in clear contradiction with the website's specific legal advice and should be interpreted restrictively. Where can we find than this image in particular has a cc-by-sa license? Because that's not made clear from the link you provide nor from the website itself. Impru20 (talk) 08:11, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It should be noted that a derivative work from this file, File:Pello Otxandiano (cropped).jpg, was deleted a couple days ago due to it indeed not having permission. Impru20 (talk) 10:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Theklan: Why don't you try contacting the party to figure out if CC-BY-SA is valid or if the language on the Terms & Conditions page takes precedence? holly {chat} 17:27, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Because it is self evident that it is free, as they have a cc-by-sa tag below. You can't do anything without their authorization, which you have because it is written below. Theklan (talk) 19:17, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, this is an interesting interpretation: "You can't do anything unless we authorize it. Oh by the way, we authorize it." Still, it certainly won't hurt to ask, so I would like you to email them to clarify. We can wait a little longer to close this DR. holly {chat} 22:04, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Theklan: Any luck? holly {chat} 19:38, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't have an answer, but the same image can be found here, where they publish things with cc-by-sa license: https://www.argia.eus/albistea/eh-bilduk-pello-otxandiano-proposatu-du-eaeko-lehendakarigai-izateko. As this is the image given by them to all the media (including those which publish under a free license), and the web states that their content is cc-by-sa, I think is pretty fair to assume that, indeed, this image is free. Anyway, I will ask again. Theklan (talk) 20:33, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per Google Translate, Argia's license declaration says "This license is valid only for texts and, in the case of photographs and illustrations, those bearing the signature of ARGIA." So this photo would not be included. holly {chat} 22:56, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Holly, permission excludes photographs. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:22, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted: as per [1]. Ccontent can be used, copied, distributed, shown, publicly displayed, modified, developed, combined with other materials, used for commercial purposes. Also File:Pello Otxandiano (cropped).jpg. Yann (talk) 10:43, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Yann as no permission (No permission since) Theklan (talk) 07:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We already discusse this: Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Pello_Otxandiano.jpg Theklan (talk) 07:29, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. License reviewed. --Yann (talk) 08:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheberrechte unklar Gisbert K (talk) 08:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


(non-admin closure) Deleted already by Billinghurst. RodRabelo7 (talk) 11:19, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's just personal photo OmidFarhang (talk) 11:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:10, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work from Finland (looks like modern modification of it as well?) with US license claim. Not demonstrated to be out of copyright in source country. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:31, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Literally all you had to do was Google the film to see that it was public domain: [2]--LadybugStardust (talk) 02:43, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Literally all you had to do is take a look at Commons regulations to see that you need to establish that it is out of copyright in the source country as well as the US. Literally all you had to do was check Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Finland to read "Copyright in a cinematographic work subsists until 70 years have elapsed from the year of the death of the last of the following to survive: the principal director, the author of the screenplay, the author of the dialogue and the composer of music specifically created for use in the cinematographic work". Literally all you had to do was google who made the film to see that director Teuvo Puro died less than 70 years ago. Now you know. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The content posted on the Internet Archive is the book with that title, not the film nor its advertising materials. Omphalographer (talk) 03:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The film was produced by Suomi-Filmi and distributed by Suomen Biografi - both companies that have been nonexistent for decades. So who does the film's copyright belong to, then? The answer: to nobody, because it's a silent film made nearly a hundred years ago and everyone involved in the production of the film is long dead. You're right, Teuvo Puro didn't die 70 years ago - he died 68 years ago. His early silent films, by all accounts, appear to be in the public domain. Can you find any sources saying that they aren't? I couldn't.--LadybugStardust (talk) 03:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Can you find any sources saying that they aren't?" Yes, the copyright law of Finland, already quoted above. Meaning it will be out of copyright in source country as of 1 January 2027 - not yet. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:41, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: seems clear that the uploader did not consider license status in the source country. Undelete in 2027. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made by accident ItsJasper12 (talk) 14:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:29, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made by accident ItsJasper12 (talk) 14:31, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per reasonably prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:27, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made by accident ItsJasper12 (talk) 14:32, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per reasonably prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made by accident ItsJasper12 (talk) 14:32, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:25, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

my own picture pliz remove asap Dennsi vareide69 (talk) 18:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

🫡 186.175.83.158 19:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi can someone please remove this picture only uploaded as an joke please remove it as fast as possible Dennsi vareide69 (talk) 18:42, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 20:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I can’t upload a new version of this file Pnn2013 (talk) 01:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 23:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made by accident ItsJasper12 (talk) 04:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 23:43, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

撮影者を特定される恐れがあるため CT-May (talk) 09:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 23:45, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Для дополнения Aladin S1 (talk) 09:54, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 23:45, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pois ele não tem página na wikipedia, minha foto. Deivinhoblog (talk) 18:21, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: already deleted by Dyolf77. --Rosenzweig τ 23:38, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nophotos1991 (talk) 19:10, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete this file as I have uploaded a personal file by mistake. Nophotos1991 (talk) 19:37, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 23:37, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete this photo Karizaki sign (talk) 20:53, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 23:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is taken from youtube with the youtube license. I refused the license review, because the youtube license is not justified. User:Yann reverted my negative review and approved the licence. So now I listed this deletion request. The film is showing the CC-BY-NC-ND licence in the beginning of the film on the upper lefthand corner as well as at the end of the film, which is not compatible with the licensing on Commons. Therefore this film should be deleted. Ellywa (talk) 21:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. I didn't see the license in the film, only in the description. --Yann (talk) 22:25, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Banana jnana (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be the user's own work. One of their images has been deleted as a copyvio by Túrelio and demonstrates a lack of understanding of copyright and the project's scope (per "the web? Nahh, the web is just stupid" and "and you actually don't know the Internet, Wikmedia (or Wikidumb) was just for babies"). The files also serve no useful purpose (COM:NOTUSED), but that's debatable.

SHB2000 (talk) 05:43, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you joking? Banana jnana (talk) 11:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: OOS prank/troll images. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:32, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: Book cover (see https://www.kupujemprodajem.com/knjige/beletristika-domaci-pisci/za-gorama-vladimir-kirda/oglas/160668905) Ђидо (talk) 06:40, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: Book cover (see search Ђидо (talk) 06:43, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Book cover Ђидо (talk) 06:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Improper US PD tag, image from getty OO 07:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CV. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file was originally .mp4, I tried to convert it, and it seems to have come out wrong. If you are not able to fix it you should delete it. Thank you. 6rt78y34tw3 (talk) 21:41, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see it perfectly. Bedivere (talk) 23:13, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 15:01, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A copy of the file File:Bildschirmabdruck 20240219 203516 One UI Home CENS.png Мункач Варош (talk) 11:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep Obviously not, please compare again, the icons and set are completely different --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:54, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy keep not a dupe.
All the best -- Chuck Talk 18:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:05, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely that claimed license applies as it's highly unlikely that a still of two characters from a present-day Indian TV show would have been first published in the US prior to 1929. Watermark suggests a copyrighted image, as well Daniel Case (talk) 20:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:09, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly unlikely that an image of a modern-day Indian actor was first published in the US almost a century ago Daniel Case (talk) 20:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:09, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the author, I don't want it to appear, alongside my name, anymore. Magnusmanuel84 (talk) 08:04, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @Magnusmanuel84: Request a change of your user name then. The file was uploaded several years ago, is COM:INUSE and in COM:SCOPE, and Creative Commons licenses are not revocable. --Rosenzweig τ 23:42, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How am I supposed to do that on Wikimedia, then? Looked for it, but didn't find any such function. Magnusmanuel84 (talk) 06:40, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Magnusmanuel84: See meta:Steward requests/Username changes or meta:Special:GlobalRenameRequest. --Rosenzweig τ 07:05, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Uff, that *shit didn't even work. The Username got renamed, yes, but all the records still show the old, now deleted one. 90.186.48.81 16:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you mean the file description pages, yes, you have to change those by hand. The file history does show the new name. --Rosenzweig τ 17:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks. 90.186.48.81 08:10, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 09:26, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the author, I don't want it to appear, alongside my name, anymore. Magnusmanuel84 (talk) 08:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 09:28, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the author, I don't want it to appear, alongside my name, anymore. Magnusmanuel84 (talk) 08:06, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 09:27, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of non free content. Yann (talk) 09:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

someone is misusing Wikimedia to post slurs in edit boxes Mhillp (talk) 15:52, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Removed and revdelled vandalism. I'm satisfied that Mhillp, the uploader, represents the company, and the license is therefore valid (VRT agents can compare the timing of Mhillp's recent edits with ticket:2023092210007615). —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:16, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ankry (talk) 20:34, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable company, advertisement. Yann (talk) 11:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:05, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional logo based on Habbo Hotel's, out of the project scope Nutshinou Talk! 11:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:06, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The content of the manga may be protected by copyright. Thyj (talk) 11:31, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:06, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Samsung Ridgefield Park building, New Jerey.jpg Мункач Варош (talk) 11:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep — the two photos are taken at different angles. Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribs) 11:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep — "Duplicate", how? They are taken from different angles, at different times of day, from different locations (one's from the Samsung parking lot, the other is from the hotel parking lot nearby) ... there's no rule on Commons that says there can only be one image of a particular building. - Kzirkel (talk) 17:02, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep — These are two distinct images. These images are not identical. They are not of equivalent quality, but that's not relevant. Therefore, do not delete. --CmdrDan (talk) 07:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:07, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no clear educational purpose  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:45, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:11, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

content not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 19:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:16, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

AI generated image out of project scope GeorgR (de) (talk) 19:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:16, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a photo placed on a wall. No FoP in Lithuania. Красный wanna talk? 20:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:17, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted item not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 20:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:17, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in scope Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 22:25, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:19, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in scope Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 22:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:20, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in scope Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 22:27, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:20, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although this is the correct stoichiometry, this is a nonsense structure. No evidence some Sr are bonded differently than others. DMacks (talk) 23:25, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:21, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

German artist de:Lucian Bernhard died in 1972, so this 1916 German poster is not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2043.

Rosenzweig τ 23:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:21, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This user promotes his/her Instagram Sridhar G (talk) 02:24, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F1 + F10 + G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:19, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This user promotes his/her Instagram Sridhar G (talk) 02:25, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F1 + F10 + G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:19, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This user promotes his/her Instagram Sridhar G (talk) 02:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F1 + F10 + G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:19, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This user promotes his/her Instagram Sridhar G (talk) 02:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F1 + F10 + G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:19, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This user promotes his/her Instagram Sridhar G (talk) 02:27, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F1 + F10 + G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:19, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This user promotes his/her Instagram Sridhar G (talk) 02:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F1 + F10 + G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:19, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This user promotes his/her Instagram Sridhar G (talk) 02:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F1 + F10 + G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:19, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This user promotes his/her Instagram Sridhar G (talk) 02:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F1 + F10 + G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:19, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This user promotes his/her Instagram Sridhar G (talk) 02:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F1 + F10 + G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:19, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tooth brushing 186.175.83.158 02:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F10 - Also looking at their crosswiki activity, possibly G3. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:20, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jane looking at the mirror 186.175.83.158 02:38, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:21, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:21, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, self-promotional logo; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:24, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, personal logo by non-contributor (only user sandbox/userpage edits); no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:25, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am requesting that my own image be deleted. GKarastergios (talk) 03:43, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of courtesy deletion period but also out of scope. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:26, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is unused, the image is deleted at the flickrlink and the license was never verified by the flickrbot Leoboudv (talk) 08:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By using WayBack Machine I was able to confirm that the file was licensed under the license mentioned (CC-BY 2.0). Since I don't have the license reviewer rights I can't confirm the license but I saw that you're a license reviewer, so can you just confirm it? I see no reason to remove the file nor do I see a reason to keep it so I'm  Neutral Kakan spelar (talk) 19:10, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per IG. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:26, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Speedy F10 Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete. File cannot be deleted for scope reasons as long as the file is used in a Wikidata entry. That said, this appears to be lacking evidence of permission from the photographer as it was uploaded by the subject. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:55, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio and self-promotion. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:00, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work/collage license laundering, ie. bottom left photo is found at https://m.facebook.com/100075958856535/ with no indication of being protected under free license. Author shall provide proof for every photo inlcuded, that it is freely licensed and does not violate other various policies of the Wikimedia Commons. A09 (talk) 10:32, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment FYI in the future you can just tag it {{subst:dw-nsd}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Derivative work of non-free content (F3). --Эlcobbola talk 12:55, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This user promotes his/her Instagram Sridhar G (talk) 02:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: already. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is unused, the image is deleted at the flickrlink and the license was never verified by the flickrbot Leoboudv (talk) 08:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By using WayBack Machine I was able to confirm that the file was licensed under the license mentioned (CC-BY 2.0). Since I don't have the license reviewer rights I can't confirm the license but I saw that you're a license reviewer, so can you just confirm it? I see no reason to remove the file nor do I see a reason to keep it so I'm  Neutral Kakan spelar (talk) 19:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:03, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 19:00, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious license and creation claims; online years earlier eg [3] Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:10, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No, it is not in the public domain. Luke Ford is not the author of this image to release the copyright to this image. No evidence the author did either. Morbidthoughts (talk) 08:12, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and

hosting PDF essays is not the role nor scope of WikiCommons; direct text to wikiversity or wikibooks are more appropriate  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete, per billinghurst. In addition, these documents contain photographs of unknown author and licensing, so permission would be needed from the photographers/copyright holders before being hosted on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 17:45, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mwakwe256 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work. One has OTRS pending. The King Saha image is marked (c) - all need permission to keep

Gbawden (talk) 13:23, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:26, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mwakwe256 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Suspected copyvios -- photos are watermarked or credited to different copyright holders in metadata.

0x0a (talk) 12:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted. No permission from authors and copyright holders Edwin Nyaika and Qiris. Taivo (talk) 08:33, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dumpygibed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Fictional content is out of the project scope

Nutshinou Talk! 22:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 23:54, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dumpygibed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User blocked for racism, and apology of Nazism. We can't trust that any of these are really free and educational.

Yann (talk) 20:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete most. This is a lot to review, but most of these appear to be unused and either 1) functional duplicates of existing flag/emblem images (e.g. File:Nationalist Flag (1939-1945).svg, duplicative of File:Flag of Spain (1938–1945).svg), 2) clearly fictitious (e.g. File:National flag of odra.png - no such real or historical nation exists), or 3) too poorly described to identify (e.g. File:Meremrt.svg - described simply as "eedede"). However, a couple of these images are in use, possibly legitimately, and those should be pulled out of the nomination and investigated separately. Omphalographer (talk) 22:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 08:53, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused subjective maps without criteria and/or sources. Unlike the First Cold War, none of the allegedly participating countries have yet agreed on the existence of the Second Cold War. So the unused maps should be deleted.

Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribs) 11:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had originally intended to delete all subjective maps from the category. However, since some maps are used in numerous non-English Wikipedia articles, I have decided to delete only the unused ones. Also, I haven't nominated the trilateral US-Russia-China maps as those maps can still be used for other purposes. Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribs) 11:12, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 23:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bertobarc90 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Five heavily photoshopped images of a church. We don't need all five, they're nearly the same size and resolution, plus the photoshopping of a halo around the entire building vastly reduces the encyclopedic utility of the images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:04, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Bertobarc90 (talk · contribs) 

Six copies of the same small size, low resolution image in various stages of photoshopping. We don't need six the same, perhaps one could be selected and retained.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:06, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:34, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP Russia (artwork & sculptures), author ru:Бубеннов, Сергей Михайлович died in 2005

Shiro NekoОбг. 18:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Дебил, цензурных слов нет. Какой предмет охраны в этом изображении? Или вы решили просто собрать на удаление всё что попалось под руку? Или же вы бы хоть потрудились почитать те ссылки, на которые сами ссылаетесь, как, например, вот это вот, где указаны произведения садово-паркового искусства. Или может быть вы не считаете за произведение садово-паркового искусства эту конструкцию, специально установленную в парке? Engelberthumperdink (talk) 05:41, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
“The court also rejected the publisher’s argument that the monument is part of the park” and “Images of sculptures ( monuments) located in places open to the public may be used freely, but not as the main object and not for profit.” You know about this, because you are a participant in such discussions in ru:Википедия:Форум/Архив/Авторское_право/2021/10#Надгробия. You can reference to the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Art. 1276 paragraph 2 to refer to, but paragraph 1 has not disappeared anywhere (the camera focuses on the monument, and anyone can crop the image) “It is allowed without the consent of the author or other right holder and without paying a fee to reproduce and distribute produced copies, to transmit on air or through a cable, to bring to public knowledge works of fine arts or photographic works which are permanently located in a public place, except if the image of the work is the main object of use or the image of a work is used for the purpose of deriving profit."
So, this image also violates both points of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Art. 1276. Shiro NekoОбг. 16:49, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. plicit 23:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very low quality Stegop (talk) 23:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:03, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Manipulated photo to "stretch" vertically. (Versions without manipulation seen elsewhere online eg [4]) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:37, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, the one you linked to actually appears to be just a cropped version of it. Either way, who the hell cares? It's a public domain photograph of someone who has been dead for more than a hundred years.--LadybugStardust (talk) 02:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not really how this works. We need images that are of at least decent quality with accurate sourcing and identifications. —Tcr25 (talk) 21:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete due to the image quality. It's also likely not to be Bunford. Postcard versions for example, in this article include the contemporaneous caption "The Three Sisters. Aama, The Giantess; and Princess Josepha, Midget." The postcard IDs the photographer as Frank Wendt, "Photo. Artist," of New York. "Lady Aama" was the stage name of Emma Aline Bataillard and this 1910 source states the photo was taken a year before Lady Aama's death, dating it to 1892. Here's an 1892 article about Aama and Josepha, but I'm not finding anything outlining Josepha's real name or history, nor anything about the third "sister." While this version should be deleted, uploading a better quality version (like the one in the paper linked above) with the correct information would be of value. —Tcr25 (talk) 21:43, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Tcr25. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WijWijs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

None of EXIF data (camera/photographer) matches. A number of images by uploader already deleted as copyvio for non-matching EXIF.

IronGargoyle (talk) 00:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:44, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner Trade (talk) 00:07, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep but revert to the 2022 version of the file where the banner had been blurred out. This is the uncropped original of the image discussed at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tyler Merbler-JesusMagaHatPosterAtCapitol.jpg where consensus was to blur the banner. Belbury (talk) 07:43, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep and revert per Belbury and  Delete the version that contains the unblurred banner. Seawolf35 (talk) 14:32, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: already reverted. Unblurred versions deleted. --P 1 9 9   15:48, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusably small image, with many alternatives Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 00:21, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and likely not own work, thumbnail. --P 1 9 9   15:47, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image violates copyright. All images from the Parliament of Victoria website are under copyright and not available to share under an open license. The website (now and in 2019 at the time of this upload) states " copyright material [can be used] for personal, non-commercial use, for research or study, or use within your organisation". The CC BY-SA license doesn't fit this, and the image should be removed as the uploader hasn't been active since making the upload and didn't defend their previous image deletion due to copyright infringement either. Jimmyjrg (talk) 02:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, fails COM:LR. --P 1 9 9   15:50, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plus d'actualité. Wouwou9001 (talk) 07:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused and outdated COA. --P 1 9 9   15:51, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is unused, the image is deleted at the flickrlink and the license was never verified by the flickrbot Leoboudv (talk) 08:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By using WayBack Machine I was able to confirm that the file was licensed under the license mentioned (CC-BY 2.0). Since I don't have the license reviewer rights I can't confirm the license but I saw that you're a license reviewer, so can you just confirm it? I see no reason to remove the file nor do I see a reason to keep it so I'm  Neutral Kakan spelar (talk) 19:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: seems to have valid free license, based on archive.org version of Aug. 7, 2021. --P 1 9 9   15:58, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pointless edit of File:Aston Martin DBS - Flickr - Alexandre Prévot (3).jpg, just an edit with a different background that is visibly low quality Nutshinou Talk! 10:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:04, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Shows involuntary political views of the artist Justanotherusers (talk) 10:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What? Are you an Android App user? Keep. 186.175.83.158 17:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. Not a valid reason for deletion (not that the keep rationale above is much better). This image is within scope and I don't see any reason to think that it is not free. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:04, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per User:Krd, courtesy deletion, alternative available. --P 1 9 9   16:11, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused subjective map without references. Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribs) 10:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:11, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused subjective map without references. Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribs) 10:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:11, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Rendered from File:Double beta decay feynman.svg, not in use, redundant, useless Nutshinou Talk! 10:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:12, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Rendered from File:Ionization chamber.svg, not in use, redundant, useless Nutshinou Talk! 10:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:12, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Rendered from File:Ionization energies.svg, not in use, redundant, useless Nutshinou Talk! 10:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:12, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong date, probably not "own work", see metadata. Xocolatl (talk) 11:07, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, screengrab. --P 1 9 9   16:12, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A wiki is not a collection of images and multimedia files Мункач Варош (talk) 11:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is Wikimedia Commons, a wiki as well as a collection of media. Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribs) 11:43, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9   16:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikimedia is not a collection of images and media files Мункач Варош (talk) 11:25, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons is indeed a collection of media. Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribs) 11:43, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9   16:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:MIUI Logo .svg Мункач Варош (talk) 11:31, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, redundant. --P 1 9 9   16:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced from the 21:40, 29 November 2015 version of File:Cefalù Pantocrator retouched.jpg, which has replaced with a superior version since, should be a redirect. (same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Christ JTS.jpeg) Nutshinou Talk! 11:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no redirect necessary. --P 1 9 9   16:15, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image depicts another runstone, Upplands runinskrifter 1087, not 1088. And it is also the same image as the file uploaded under the name Upplands runinskrifter 1087.png My mistake when I uploaded it. Matanb (talk) 11:42, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   16:16, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent bulk COM:NETCOPYVIOs - either low res with no EXIF or EXIF from many disparate cameras (e.g., NIKON D7200, NIKON D5200, NIKON D7500, ILCE-7M3, Canon PowerShot SX540, etc.), elsewhere before upload (e.g., File:Gripen-weapons.jpg is here; File:BTR-80A of the Hungarian Army.jpg is here; File:Hungarian T-72 in exercise.jpg is here; File:Polaris MRZR 4.jpg is here; etc.), user significant copyvio history, etc. Duck/PRP issue.

Эlcobbola talk 21:39, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:42, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User blocked for copyvios (3 times), small files without EXIF data, dubious copyright status.

Yann (talk) 06:04, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per COM:PRP, The uploader has a history of uploading copyrighted materials, making it highly likely that the images in question are also copyvio. Ckfasdf (talk) 01:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 09:38, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User with a bad history, blocked 3 times for copyvios, small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 11:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:17, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A 1968 UK newspaper article is still protected by copyright in both the UK and the US. The author en:Clement Freud died in 2009, so the file can be restored in 2080 (unless the photograph illustrating the text is found to be still protected by copyright then). Rosenzweig τ 12:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:17, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On source page (also archived near-upload date source page: https://web.archive.org/web/20140901045858/http://www.brewiarz.katolik.pl/czytelnia/swieci/11-19a.php3) there is not such photo. There is also no proof that it was published pre 1923. 178.37.205.142 13:32, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also hoax: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kinga_w%C4%99gierska.jpg 178.37.205.142 13:32, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:18, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a picture of me, that was posted without my permission. 2001:9E8:184:8A00:F457:B7B3:17A7:34B 14:10, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo of non-notable person. --P 1 9 9   16:20, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from promo photo. Should be blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:22, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

article in image form, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:48, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:22, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Austrian artist Franz Griessler died in 1974, so these 1917 and 1918 posters are still protected by copyright in Austria, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2045.

Rosenzweig τ 21:34, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:25, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Meta data and small size picture make it unlikely to be uploader owned. Likely from LinkedIn. Pierre cb (talk) 14:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Meta data and small size picture make it unlikely to be uploader owned. I later found it on LinkedIn. Pierre cb (talk) 14:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible F10 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use on enWiki article. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:43, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

requested deletion of article at enWP; put on hold until that is resolved.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by User:Billinghurst. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The German artist de:Julius Diez died in 1957, so this 1916 German poster is not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2028. Rosenzweig τ 23:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:34, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COSTUME.

eien20 (talk) 13:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:32, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jimfbleak as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: image of offcial dociument is from 1944, "created" in 2016 as "own work"  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:04, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep personnal documents, photographed by a member of Jean Larrieu's familly and uploaded in 2016. Le Petit Chat (talk) 16:07, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, yes this military identity card is part of the archives of Jean Larrieu of which I am the only heir. I scanned it in 2016 from the original that I have in my possession. Kind regards, Jean Larrieu Jean Larrieu (talk) 16:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep If we deleted every image where the upload date was used as the creation date, we would not have many images. The date has been fixed. --RAN (talk) 02:13, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - 1944 photograph has a URAA copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:31, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jimfbleak as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: image of offcial dociument is from 1944, "created" in 2016 as "own work"  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Jean Larrieu's personnal documents, photographed and uploaded in 2016. Le Petit Chat (talk) 16:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, yes this military identity card is part of the archives of Jean Larrieu of which I am the only heir. I scanned it in 2016 from the original that I have in my possession. Kind regards, Jean Larrieu Jean Larrieu (talk) 16:13, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Yes the scan was created in 2016 and is the own work of the person who scanned it. The original document is not eligible for a copyright. I am not sure why you think this document would be eligible for a copyright. --RAN (talk) 02:23, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:30, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a picture of me, that was posted without my permission. Marlon Profuß (talk) 14:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:29, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2475TV is not the original author of the picture, The Channel 3/5/7/9... is the original author and does not allowed to be use freely Asdavdh (talk) 14:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:28, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ประชาไท (Prachatai) is not the original author of the picture, The Thai Parliament Television (TPTV) is the original author and does not allowed to be use freely Asdavdh (talk) 14:32, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:28, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

People in these areas are very sensitive about their pictures being taken much less being uploaded to internet without their permission. It seems as though the photographer was visitor to this area who stopped by and took the picture of these individuals while they were going about their business on the road. It is clear that these people were not aware of their picture being taken by a stranger. This is being used to depict traditional clothing but they did not allow you to use their picture to show their clothing and neither they were wearing those clothes so you take their picture without their permission and upload it to the internet. This should be deleted in respect of a right of choice of these people. SheriffIsInTown (talk) 14:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:28, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arrowvel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from modern art on temporary display.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:26, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No publication date, no publicator, wrong licence, couldn't be PD-Polish or PD-anon 178.37.205.142 16:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Plik jest w domenie publicznej https://www.szukajwarchiwach.gov.pl/jednostka/-/jednostka/5932960 Kustoszka (talk) 06:47, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - Subject lived 1885-1964. If this image is after 1929 it has a URAA copyright. PCP applies. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:25, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably wrong date, wrong source and wrong author Xocolatl (talk) 17:37, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Obviously in the public domain, no reason to delete, please just slap on a {{Wrong license}} in the file description for now Nutshinou Talk! 18:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:22, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably wrong date, wrong source and wrong author Xocolatl (talk) 17:37, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Obviously in the public domain, no reason to delete, please just slap on a {{Wrong license}} in the file description for now Nutshinou Talk! 18:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:22, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably wrong date, wrong source, wrong author Xocolatl (talk) 17:38, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Obviously in the public domain, no reason to delete, please just slap on a {{Wrong license}} in the file description for now Nutshinou Talk! 18:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:22, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably wrong date, wrong source, wrong author Xocolatl (talk) 17:38, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Obviously in the public domain, no reason to delete, please just slap on a {{Wrong license}} in the file description for now Nutshinou Talk! 18:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:22, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably wrong date, wrong source, wrong author Xocolatl (talk) 17:40, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Obviously in the public domain, no reason to delete, please just slap on a {{Wrong license}} in the file description for now Nutshinou Talk! 18:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:22, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably wrong date, wrong source, wrong author Xocolatl (talk) 17:40, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Obviously in the public domain, no reason to delete, please just slap on a {{Wrong license}} in the file description for now Nutshinou Talk! 18:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:22, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably wrong date, wrong source, wrong author Xocolatl (talk) 17:41, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Obviously in the public domain, no reason to delete, please just slap on a {{Wrong license}} in the file description for now Nutshinou Talk! 18:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:17, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid licensing tag. Presumably copyright as directly from Britannica (https://www.britannica.com/biography/David-Kellogg-Lewis) via Prinecton Aza24 (talk) 18:34, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:14, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright 186.174.60.245 01:08, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The uploader, @Flicksart: was likely also the photographer. They appear to have a connection to the event based on their contributions on enwiki, and a similar but not idential image was posted here. – Kjerish (talk) 07:06, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Crop of a deleted file. Better admins needed. 186.175.83.158 18:48, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:13, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. A reverse image search finds this image at https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/actor-katie-mcgrath-poses-for-a-portrait-shoot-in-london-on-news-photo/83046219. Chris Ssk (talk) 19:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:13, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. A reverse image search finds this image at https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/actor-katie-mcgrath-poses-for-a-portrait-shoot-in-london-on-news-photo/83046219. Chris Ssk (talk) 19:06, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:12, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Modern Sciences as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: this is not own workD Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is my own image. He is going through all of my photos and reporting them for some reason Catboy69 (talk) 21:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - Instagram image. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:11, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt that any of the images uploaded by this user are "own work", and I suspect them of being undisclosed and misleading AI-generated images. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Omphalographer pointed out that the medals are deformed and nonsensical, which strongly suggests AI generation. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete The first and second images clearly look like they were generated by AI. The origin of the third image is questionable, but there's a couple of very similar portrait of Haitian heads of state out there. So if I were to guess they are probably the basis for it. For instance this one, which is of a different president but looks essentially the same. Either that, or both are AI generated. Who knows. There's clearly something going on here though. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:21, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete per Adamant1. Nosferattus (talk) 18:52, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:10, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the works of Roger Broders are now in the public domain in France, this 1930 poster is still copyrighted in the USA because the URAA restored its US copyright. Per Commons:Licensing, the file is therefore not acceptable for Wikimedia Commons and should be deleted. It can be restored in 2026. Rosenzweig τ 21:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:09, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erro de imagem e informações não apuradas Pedro aku (talk) 21:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:08, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

That the video is taken by a US government employee, it doesn't impact that this is a derivative work. A photo would be okay, the video is not. No fair use  — billinghurst sDrewth 21:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:07, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Aurelio de Sandoval as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The image is from a film from Mexico with copyright and there is no evidence that it is in the public domain  — billinghurst sDrewth 21:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:06, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Neveselbert (mobile) as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted in UK, per COM:UK#Known author (Walter Stoneman).  — billinghurst sDrewth 21:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Walter Stoneman died 1958. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:06, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains copyright credit to "THOMAS THOMPSON". Is oakland-100 "THOMAS THOMPSON"? COM:PCP ViperSnake151 (talk) 21:54, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:03, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be a professionally taken photo, but with no indication it has been released to the public domain. It appears on this website [5] and perhaps others. DaffodilOcean (talk) 23:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - © 2024 The University of Tennessee Health Science Center. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:03, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikimedia is not a collection of images and media files Мункач Варош (talk) 11:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons is indeed a collection of media. Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribs) 11:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But it is not used in any project --Мункач Варош (talk) 10:01, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:42, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of text claimed as own work by the uploader in 2024 but elements of the text have been online since at least 2018. For example, "Cabinet was commissioned for Allen G Everitt, the Secretary of the Royal Birmingham Society of Artists, by other members of the Society, on the occasion of his marriage in 1880" is on the Birmingham museum website. At the very least this is plagiarised text with no source, if not an outright copyright violation. From Hill To Shore (talk) 12:31, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The text is now redundant. I have incorporated the useful information into Wikidata at Everitt Cabinet (Q125680000) and in the image description at File:1892M41 Everitt Cabinet.jpg. From Hill To Shore (talk) 21:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. It's difficult to see how I have plagiarised text when I have quoted more than is on the museum website. The fact is, they both come from the same source: the information panel describing the cabinet. And as the cabinet was acquired in the late 1890s and put in display in the next few years, the text would be now out of copyright as well. Jgdc47B (talk) 09:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You claimed in your upload that the text was your own work from 2024 and now you state that someone else was the author at some point between 1880 and 2024. That is the problem. You can't make false claims when uploading files to Commons. Claiming authorship of someone else's writing is the definition of plagiarism.
Do you have evidence that the text was produced before 1904? If not, it may still be subject to copyright. From Hill To Shore (talk) 09:44, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn’t claiming that the text is mine, but that the file (transcript) is mine. Jgdc47B (talk) 13:33, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately you have not explained that anywhere on the file page. All the file page says at the moment is that you were the sole author, the text was written in 2024 and you (as the sole copyright holder) licence the text for reuse under a creative commons licence. Where you copy information (such as text and images) you need to be as detailed as possible about your source and what part you are claiming copyright ownership of. See COM:Derivative for more information. From Hill To Shore (talk) 13:57, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. That’s helpful. Is it possible for me to edit the upload? Jgdc47B (talk) 14:33, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, if you click the link to the file above, you should see either "edit" buttons or pencil icons (depending on the device you are using to access the page). Make sure to keep the deletion notification (an administrator will remove it after closing this discussion) but you can update the rest of the information. From Hill To Shore (talk) 14:42, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I have done that. We'll see what happens. Jgdc47B (talk) 08:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - pure text has no place here. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:41, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image claimed to be from 1965 in the UK with no identified author. Claim that an archivist possessing a copy of the image has released it from copyright, which is not a valid argument unless the archive can prove ownership of copyright. Uploaded as CC0 but with no supporting evidence. If this was by an unknown photographer in the UK, it would be protected for 70 years from creation per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United Kingdom. That would mean the UK copyright would expire on 1 January 2036. The US copyright would be 95 years from publication. As the image looks like it has come from a newspaper and it was for a ceremony in 1965, it is likely to have been published the same year. US copyright will expire on 1 January 2061. From Hill To Shore (talk) 12:40, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:39, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jimfbleak as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image is from 1962, "created" in 2012  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:53, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep familial heritage, it seems that the uploader is Jean Larrieu's heir. I have never seen that photograph published elsewhere. Le Petit Chat (talk) 16:06, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour, oui cette image fait partie des archives photographiques de Jean Larrieu dont je suis le seul héritier. Cordialement, Jean Larrieu Jean Larrieu (talk) 16:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, yes this image is part of the photographic archives of Jean Larrieu of which I am the sole heir. I scanned it in 2012 from the original that I have in my possession. Kind regards, Jean Larrieu Jean Larrieu (talk) 16:11, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, yes this photograph is part of the personal archives of Jean Larrieu of which I am the sole heir. I scanned it in 2012 from the original that I have in my possession. I also provided it to the 13th Dragoon Regiment so that they could use it in books and in the bulletin of their Amicale. Sincerely, Jean Larrieu Jean Larrieu (talk) 16:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - URAA copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:38, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jimfbleak as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: image is from 1962, "created" in 2012  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:54, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep the uploader seems to be Jean Larrieu's heir and I have never seen that photograph published elsewhere. Le Petit Chat (talk) 15:31, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, yes this photograph is part of the personal archives of Jean Larrieu of which I am the sole heir. I scanned it in 2012 from the original that I have in my possession. I also provided it to the 13th Dragoon Regiment so that they could use it in books and in the bulletin of their Amicale. Sincerely, Jean Larrieu Jean Larrieu (talk) 16:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination -- 1962 image is still under copyright in France. Jean Larrieu is named as author, but that's plainly not correct. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:37, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jimfbleak as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: image of offcial dociument is from 1944, "created" in 2016 as "own work"  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep family heritage, the uploader seems to be Jean Larrieu's heir. Le Petit Chat (talk) 15:29, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, yes this photograph is part of the personal archives of Jean Larrieu of which I am the sole heir. I scanned it in 2016 from the original that I have in my possession. Kind regards, Jean Larrieu Jean Larrieu (talk) 16:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The date has been changed to the date the original image was taken. --RAN (talk) 02:27, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@RAN hello, you changed the copyright status to Template:PD-EU-no author disclosure, couldn't it be Template:Cc-by-sa-3.0-heirs ? I know that the photographer isn't Jean Larrieu but the photograph was given to his family. -- Le Petit Chat (talk) 05:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The copyright was held by the photographer, only the photographer and their heirs can release under a CC license, not the person appearing in the image. --RAN (talk) 05:26, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - URAA copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:35, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jimfbleak as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: image of offcial dociument is from 1945, "created" in 2016 as "own work"  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Jean Larrieu's personnal documents, photographed and uploaded in 2016 by a member of his family. Le Petit Chat (talk) 16:04, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, yes this quote is part of the personal archives of Jean Larrieu of which I am the only heir. I scanned it in 2016 from the original that I have in my possession. Kind regards, Jean Larrieu Jean Larrieu (talk) 16:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination -- copyrighted text. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:34, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP Ovruni (talk) 03:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strong support - per @Ovruni rationale.
Ethereal Whisper (talk) 03:45, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:10, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source says "TODOS LOS DERECHOS LIBERADOS. SE PUEDEN REPRODUCIR, USAR Y DESCARGAR TODOS LOS CONTENIDOS, SIN ALTERARLOS Y CITANDO LA FUENTE. DIRECCIÓN DE PRENSA, PRESIDENCIA DE LA REPÚBLICA DE CHILE", which Google translates to (emphasis added) "ALL RIGHTS RELEASED. ALL CONTENTS CAN BE REPRODUCED, USED AND DOWNLOADED, WITHOUT ALTERING THEM AND CITIING THE SOURCE." I think we require images to be free to be altered. —Bagumba (talk) 08:02, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I don't think the simple cropping of an image is a derivation, so I believe it is within what the license limits... (sorry my bad English) André Koehne TALK TO ME 19:06, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Incorrect, André Koehne. And that's not even the issue. The licence restriction as stipulated is "ND" (no derivatives) and that is a explicitly not allowed on Commons. Schwede66 21:41, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Tks, Schwede66... So, the error is not in Commons image, but on the page that contains a license that does not comply with Chilean law. André Koehne TALK TO ME 00:08, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No. The image should never have been uploaded to Commons as it does not have a free licence. Schwede66 00:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but... See this file: President Franklin D. Roosevelt jokes with President Getulio Vargas of Brazil - the photograph was taken by a soldier, on official service to the United States. As much as he was the author, the law is above his copyright. The same happens with the photograph of a Chilean government body - no matter how differently they write, the law is above and, therefore, we must apply what the law says here - and not what is on the website. André Koehne TALK TO ME 02:40, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I used Google Translate on the document and found the relevant text being: El contenido que se genere en las plataformas digitales y sitios electronicos debera ser publicado bajo licencia "Creative Commons" de atribucion, a fin de permitir a las personas copair y distribuir la obra, reconociendo la autoria del autor.
(Pardon any spelling mistakes in manually transcribed text)
Translation per Google Translate: The content generated on digital platforms and electronic sites must be published under a "Createive Commons" attribution license, in order to allow people to copy and distribute the work, recognizing the author's authorship
The document is silent on whether derivatives are allowed or not. As such, in absence of further documentation that specify that the license should allow derivatives, if the government website ascribes that derivates are not allowed, we should honour it as it clears up such ambiguity for that website. After all, among the variants of Creative Commons licenses, there are some that carry the nd clause. Robertsky (talk) 03:54, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Robertsky (talk) 03:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- The quoted phase says, " "ALL RIGHTS RELEASED. ALL CONTENTS CAN BE REPRODUCED, USED AND DOWNLOADED, WITHOUT ALTERING " "All Rights Released" contradicts "without altering". Since it is a rule of legal construction that ambiguities must be construed against the person who wrote them, we can rely on "All rights released" and ignore the rest. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:14, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by PotsdamLamb as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Toy Same image as on page
Converted to regular DR as original rationale not valid (hit used this file from Commons). However, it should be discussed whether the depicted truck itself is copyrighted/above COM:TOO, per COM:TOYS. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:38, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:15, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A copy of the file File:One-ui logo.svg Мункач Варош (talk) 08:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:18, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incompatible licenses. Combination of GFDL and cc by-sa licenses. 0x0a (talk) 13:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete We no longer allow GFDL uploads (COM:L). Perhaps an exception could be made for derivative works/copies of files already uploaded here before the cutoff, but I see no educational value to this file which is just two photos put together. File is unused. Consigned (talk) 22:50, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:19, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks to be recent copyrighted art: https://www.reddit.com/r/Somalia/comments/103ybux/artwork_of_medieval_mogadishu_and_zheng_hes/ Themightyquill (talk) 19:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:17, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mir kommt das Wappen merkwürdig "zusammengeschustert" vor. Das regt in mir den Verdacht, dass es sich um eine recht neue Erfindung handelt, somit stellt sich die Frage des Urheberrechts. Und: Was ist ein "Nachbarschaftswappen"? Ist es kein Ortswappen, sondern ein Vereinswappen? Hat dann der Verein die Urheberrechte? GerritR (talk) 19:48, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Das Wappen wurde vom Verschönerungsverein erstellt und ist laut diesem gemeinfrei. (Siehe: Hohe Wappenrolle von Woltersdorf, 2021, S. 32) Ich habe eine Version dieser Wappen für Wikipedia erstellt. Das Wappen wird in der Nachbarschaft verwendet und ist im Heimatmuseum einsehbar. Mehlitz (talk) 15:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Außerdem out of scope. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:L%C3%B6schkandidaten/1._Mai_2024#Liste_der_Wappen_von_Woltersdorf_an_der_Schleuse_(gel%C3%B6scht) zur Kenntnis.--GerritR (talk) 20:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nochmal zur Verdeutlichung: Das Wappen ist out of scope, weil es (wie alle Wappen dieser Art aus Woltersdorf) von einem Verein erfunden wurde und keineswegs offiziell ist. GerritR (talk) 18:39, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:17, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kein eigenes Werk, demnach Copyright? Und vermutlich Fantasiewappen, also out of scope GerritR (talk) 19:53, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:17, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vermutlich kein traditionelles Wappen, sondern relativ neue Erfindung. Vermutlich von einem Wappengrafiker entworfen, dann aber kein Eigenes Werk. So oder so liegt die Beweislast beim Hochlader. GerritR (talk) 19:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:17, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kein eigenes Werk, kein offizielles Wappen, welches gemeinfrei wäre, also zieht Copyright. Siehe auch https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_Wappen_von_Woltersdorf_an_der_Schleuse (gilt demnach für alle Wappen von Woltersdorf!) GerritR (talk) 20:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Das Wappen wurde vom Verschönerungsverein erstellt und ist laut diesem gemeinfrei. (Siehe: Hohe Wappenrolle von Woltersdorf, 2021, S. 32) Ich habe eine Version dieser Wappen für Wikipedia erstellt. Das Wappen wird in der Nachbarschaft verwendet und ist im Heimatmuseum einsehbar. Mehlitz (talk) 15:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Das Wappen ist aber außerdem out of scope. Die Verwendung in dem Wikipedia-Artikel über die DEMOS-Siedlung ist fragwürdig, weil es kein offizielles Wappen ist. Die Verwendung suggeriert einen pseudo-offiziellen Status, der aber nicht existiert.--GerritR (talk) 18:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:17, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Ployrapat1977 (talk) 16:45, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:53, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Asdavdh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1xikAwkYmRwU7a1qw6JtPD3liSFRAhLfH  — billinghurst sDrewth 21:48, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:16, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced from the 18:56, 24 June 2009 version of File:Inter-AlliedGames.jpg, which has replaced with a superior version since, should be a redirect. Nutshinou Talk! 10:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Affiche de 1919 donc de 105 ans. Aucune certitude sur la date de décès de l'auteur certes mais les 70 ans sont très vraisemblables. Ce serait dommage de priver Wikimédia d'un document exposé fréquement en diverses occasions et très probablement tombé dans le domaine piblic. 2A01:E0A:C8A:60C0:484C:9EA3:58C7:1229 13:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion,is the same of some older version of Inter-AlliedGames.jpg. It is used on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 16:05, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

colore di sfondo errato, forma dell'albero errata, non conforme all'originale. Si veda la pagina di discussione IT1315922 (talk) 15:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, ho visto ora anche l'email che mi hai inviato: in base alle norme sul Copyright possiamo usare solo la blasonatura come guida, teoricamente non dovremmo nemmeno guardare al disegno ufficiale, ma a norma araldica ogni variante che segue la blasonatura è corretta (nel caso di smalti e metalli, c'è uno standard che seguiamo per gli stemmi italiani). Se vuoi chiedere al comune la concessione dello stemma ufficiale, saremmo ben lieti di caricarlo e vettorializzarlo in modo più affine all'uso ufficiale. Sciking (talk) 15:40, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comunque qualcosa, a livello estetico, posso fare, vedo appena sono al computer. Sciking (talk) 15:42, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Non conosco l'araldica e, da profano, sono basito dalla risposta: se lo stemma usato nei documenti ufficiali del comune ha una tonalità di sfondo ben diversa su wikipedia si lascia un colore differente ben sapendo che è differente e solo per rispettare uno standard astratto?
Ne prendo atto ma mi pare l'introduzione di una informazione sbagliata sul paese nella pagina di wikipedia.
Vedo di contattare l'amministrazione comunale e spero di poter rimediare a questo che, per me, è un errore. IT1315922 (talk) 19:10, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@IT1315922 non credere che ciò che viene prodotto dalle amministrazioni locali, soprattutto in tema di araldica, sia oro colato. L'araldica non è una scienza esatta (ci arrivo), ma ha delle regole, e l'ente armigero *non* ha nessuna "golden share" sul disegno dello stemma.
C'è un grosso equivoco di base - mediamente diffuso - in merito al funzionamento dell'araldica. Semplificando al massimo: uno stemma non è un logo. Perché il logo, tipicamente, è sempre "disegnato così", secondo canoni ben codificati in un manuale di immagine coordinata... mentre lo stemma ha quale *unica* costante per definirlo la *blasonatura*, che è una descrizione puramente testuale. Cosa significa ciò? Significa che il disegnatore ha ampia libertà nel renderla graficamente: basti pensare che quasi tutte le sfumature del blu, in araldica, sono liquidate come "azzurro" (a parte rari casi, come il "campo di cielo" per la tonalità molto chiara usata appunto come cielo), il giallo o l'ocra sono sempre "oro" e così via... per non parlare dei millemila aspetti che può avere, che so, un leone (vedi Category:SVG_coat_of_arms_elements_-_lions). Partendo da una blasonatura "di nero al leone rampante d'oro" posso avere questo (file:Royal_Arms_of_Belgium.svg) così come questo (file:Armoiries Brabant.svg).
Di riflesso, se uno stemma rispetta la blasonatura codificata, è automaticamente valido, senza che una resa grafica abbia la prelazione su un'altra. Poi intendiamoci, giustamente il Comune userà una propria versione (in quel caso sì, alla stregua di un logo) nei suoi ambiti istituzionali, per patrocini e altro... ma primo, non è più "vera" delle altre, secondo, essendo un design proprietario, non è il massimo volerlo adoperare anche qui, dove imperano le licenze libere. Anzi, da un punto di vista formale, 99/100 i design proprietari dei comuni, in quanto bene immateriale dell'ente, *non* sono legalmente concedibili per usi commerciali e quindi non possono essere rilasciati sotto le licenze libere che valgono per Wikimedia Commons.
Per quel che posso constatare, questo stemma è conforme alla blasonatura codificata nel DPR 4 ottobre 1986, per cui non vi è motivo di procedere a una sostituzione. Magari si può lavorare sull'aspetto, ma senza ansie. Per ulteriori ragguagli rimando a questa discussione dove analogo tema è stato approfonditamente disaminato, e invito altresì alla lettura di questo saggio di Alessandro Savorelli, uno dei migliori araldisti italiani Vale93b (talk) 08:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Leggo solo ora. Grazie per la spiegazione. IT1315922 (talk) 07:25, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep e, al proposito, si legga attentamente it:WP:STEMMA SBAGLIATO --Arrow303 (talk) 09:07, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • To non-italian-speaking admins: please, close this procedure, which has been started on unfounded and inconsistent reasons, by keeping the file. Thanks. --Vale93b (talk) 12:13, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No reason for deletion of this file. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral file is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The file is currently in use on the projects, so it has to be maintained. However, the history of the file is showing two versions, they could be splitted so both can be used on the projects, according to user judgement. --Ellywa (talk) 16:09, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Literally under copyright in the source provided (VOA/Ginette Fleure Adandé) Aréat (talk) 21:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per remarks. --Ellywa (talk) 16:10, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]