User talk:Useddenim: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot (talk | contribs)
m Robot: Archiving 1 thread (older than 31d) to User talk:Useddenim/Archive 1.
FSV (talk | contribs)
m Robot: Archiving 1 thread (older than 31d) to User talk:Useddenim/Archive 1.
Line 40: Line 40:


::::Jumping in from nowhere. Point 3, ain't the uw-turns "45°" not "90°"? --[[User:Civilspanaren|Civilspanaren]] ([[User talk:Civilspanaren|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 17:03, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
::::Jumping in from nowhere. Point 3, ain't the uw-turns "45°" not "90°"? --[[User:Civilspanaren|Civilspanaren]] ([[User talk:Civilspanaren|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 17:03, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

== GO Logo ==

Hey. I reverted your change, I don't know what your aim was, but I reverted the version of [[:File:GO Transit logo.svg]] you uploaded because it increased in size, and the transparency between the shapes was lost. I guess try again? Cheers. --'''[[User:Natural RX|<font color="#000000">Natural</font>]] [[User talk:Natural RX|<font color="#ff0000">R</font><sub><font color="#000000">X</font></sub>]]''' 01:11, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
:Whaa? It’s 840 × 400 pixels, same as before, but only 595 '''Bytes''', approximately 1/32nd the size of the 19 '''Kilobyte''' Inkscape version you uploaded. And it ''is'' supposed to be white—''not'' transparent—between the green elements. (I guess you don’t remember the original Hawker cars and the GP40TCs.) So if you don’t mind reverting your undo… [[User:Useddenim|Useddenim]] ([[User talk:Useddenim#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 01:31, 16 March 2014 (UTC)


== vKRWs ==
== vKRWs ==

Revision as of 01:54, 20 April 2014

Reverts

Moved to Talk:BSicon/Categorization.

Neath and Tennant again

Moved to Talk:BSicon/Renaming#Similar looks

vSTRs

Moved to Talk:BSicon/Renaming#vSTR

Standard Icons

Moved to Talk:BSicon/Icon geometry and SVG code neatness#Standard Icons

Roads in tunnel

I dunno if you're aware of Category:BSicon/road/tunnel or not, but decided to notify you just in case... See also Talk:BSicon/Categorization#Category:BSicon/road/tunnel. YLSS (talk) 20:07, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No I wasn’t. Should one be a redirect to the other? Useddenim (talk) 23:40, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose you should better consult Tuválkin (at that talk page). YLSS (talk) 06:22, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Well, I created Category:BSicon/road/tunnel to be the 1st of a general replacement of our whole category tree away from the misnamed Category:Icons for railway descriptions (and canals, et c.). I defend three main points:
  1. Having Category:BSicon as the main root our cat tree.
  2. Using shorter “breadcrumbs” — e.g. "stations" instead "stations and stops", "parallel" instead "parallel lines", et c.
  3. Using understandable “breadcrumb” words — e.g. "90°" instead "uw", "shift½" instead "krw", et c.
That move should be done sooner or later. Sooner seems better… ;-) -- Tuválkin 20:51, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Jumping in from nowhere. Point 3, ain't the uw-turns "45°" not "90°"? --Civilspanaren (talk) 17:03, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

vKRWs

moved to Talk:BSicon/Renaming/SPL#vKRWs

Tunnels

Hello! If you have the time, I'd be happy if you could help with making some more tunnel-icons. The first icons I think about is RP4-turns, like   (tRP2lf)  (tRP2lg)  (tRP2rf)  (tRP2rg) and some corners for the uw-tunnel icons you made some weeks ago. --Civilspanaren (talk) 16:57, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I’ll take care of it in the next 36 hours. Useddenim (talk) 17:00, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. Useddenim (talk) 23:51, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]