User talk:Lycaon/Archive 18

Category ?

Hi Hans!
The new category for promoted QI is necessary and it is probable for promoted VI.
"Mycetozoa" or more general "Other forms of life". Please, help me at free time.
Sincerely, George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:41, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

 almost done Prepared categories but .js file seems to be protected ([1]). Lycaon (talk) 15:09, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

OK, thanks. I have asked Eusebius now. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:32, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Hi Hans!
The new category for promoted QI is still necessary --George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:46, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

I'm on it. Lycaon (talk) 08:22, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Hi Hans! Commons:Quality images/Recently promoted has one error (in .js) --George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:57, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Yes indeed. It should be under the root, not under Animals. We should contact Eusebius again . Lycaon (talk) 11:03, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lycalopex culpaeus (Culpeo).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met, best in scope --George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:10, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:38, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Strigilla carnaria (Large Strigilla).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The pallial sinus and the hinge teeth are important in Bivalvia taxonomy. It would be useful also to show the inner side with these characteristics. --Llez (talk) 20:02, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

• That would be indeed the ideal picture, but here we choose the most valuable on commons. Id has been established by linking the species to the place where I found it (East coast of Dominica, W.I.). Lycaon (talk) 06:17, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

 Support It was only a suggestion. Nevertheless, all criteria met --Llez (talk) 12:26, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:08, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Ecotourism Svalbard.JPG

The image has a CC 3.0 license, I'm allowed to edit it. --IdLoveOne (talk) 16:00, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Sure you can edit it, but not necessarily upload it over the original. Lycaon (talk) 06:59, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Well I haven't seen a rule against it or a creator's explicit request not to, and I don't think it was a very major edit anyway. --IdLoveOne (talk) 07:29, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

It is not a rule, it is a courtesy, and the owner has requested to me personally. Regards. Lycaon (talk) 07:31, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Suggestions ?

My turn: suggestions for Commons:Categories for discussion/2010/09/Category:Bird's-eye view ? --Foroa (talk) 16:31, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Hmm. Aerial views I would restrict to images taken from planes and satellites (not attached to the ground), bird's eye views I would reserve for earth based imagery (taken with the horizon below the viewers position or not visible because of the angle). Regards. Lycaon (talk) 06:58, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Acanthopleura granulata (West Indian fuzzy chiton).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Llez (talk) 11:08, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:57, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lesser Todaropsis eblanae (Lesser Flying Squid).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment One tentacle is cut off (a predator attack?) --George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:24, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Probably a 'fishing accident' ;-). The animal was brought in like that by our observer team from the Celtic Sea. Lycaon (talk) 10:30, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Not ideal, but it is best that we have at this moment --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:40, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 07:20, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Loligo vulgaris (Common Squid).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:29, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:41, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 07:20, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alosa fallax (Twaid shad).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:34, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 07:21, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Limanda limanda (Dab).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met - (This image could be at least QI) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:32, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 07:22, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks ...

... for linking according to guidelines my nomination to VI. I will do it correctly the next time. Regards. elemaki (talk) 13:03, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Star

Hot stuff, much appreciated. Will keep checking which information can be added, and which translations can be done, especially in images related to Africa. JMK (talk) 14:20, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stichastrella rosea (Rosy Starfish).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support good studio work, criteria met --George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:36, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 15:32, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pegusa lascaris (Sand Sole).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support One image in scope, criteria met for a studio photo --George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:47, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 20:18, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arnoglossus laterna (Scaldfish).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:29, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 20:24, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lernaeocera branchialis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support criteria met, rare --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:15, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 09:17, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
HLV Svanen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support after considering. All criteria met --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:54, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 09:17, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Tanaissus lilljeborgi, Belgian Continental Shelf - 2000.jpg

Hello Lycaon! May I suggest that you explain your renaming request more precisely? Indeed, I do not see what is the nonsensical part in the file name, according to the file description, everything seems right: scientific name, location, year. I'll be glad to respond positively to your renaming request, but not before you point me to any file name error justifying it. Maybe I'm simply to blind to see something obvious... Greetings, Grand-Duc (talk) 00:10, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Hi. The picture was taken in 2005, not 2000. Sampling date is irrelevant here. It is moreover the only image on Commons of this animal (indeed on the internet if I'm correct) and the phrase 'Belgian Continental Shelf' is no longer legally correct as it is now called the 'Belgian part of the North Sea'. Therefore file:Tanaissus lilljeborgi.jpg should suffice IMO. Thanks for the feedback. Lycaon (talk) 00:17, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome! I'll do the renaming now, this explanation is way enough for me. Greetings, Grand-Duc (talk) 00:22, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Lycaon (talk) 00:23, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Erodium ciconium (Common stork's bill), fruit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met and only one in scope --George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:59, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 23:41, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Rename command: help needed

Hi Hans,

I was recently given the right of renaming files but am not sure how to do it. Suppose that I want to rename "old image" as "new image" and reflect the change in all pages where the image is used. How and where do I use the following code? -

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:old image with File:new image across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: give reason here

. Regards, Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Hi Joachim. Just add the line you quoted at the bottom of the list on User_talk:CommonsDelinker/commands. An admin will the move it to the User:CommonsDelinker/commands site where a bot will take care of it. Cheers. Lycaon (talk) 12:22, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:24, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Sorry Hans, I still have two questions:

1. What prevents any user of doing what you describe? I've tried as a IP user and it seemed to work;
2. Why isn't the "move" tab mentioned in Commons:File renaming not visible in the image files (or any other file)? Do I still have to do anything to implement the filemover right?

Thanks, again -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:01, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

1. Indeed everybody can do that, but an admin has to scrutinize before moving this request to the page where it will be actually done. So it is the admin's responsibility.
2. No clue. I haven't requested moving rights, as IMO moving rights without the right to delete the redirects afterwards and use the delinker only lead to confusing and complicates situations.

Lycaon (talk) 13:10, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pharus legumen (Bean razor clam).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Only one picture in scope. All criteria met for studio photo --Llez (talk) 15:20, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:44, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Platichthys flesus (European Flounder).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:15, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:46, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anthus petrosus (Rock Pipit).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:48, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:44, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Myiozetetes granadensis (Grey-capped Flycatcher).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:19, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:45, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alcedo cristata (Malachite Kingfisher).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Some crop perhaps... would make bird bigger. --Mile (talk) 18:20, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 Support Scope rich and of good quality, the choice is difficult. Best un scope for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:16, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:46, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pomatostomus temporalis (Grey-crowned Babbler).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:17, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:46, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Papilio fuscus (Fuscous Swallowtail).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:46, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:49, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bee on Yellow Flower.jpg

I don't see why you think this image will have no success. Please Explain this to me. Thomas888b (talk) 17:16, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Neither insect nor flower are sufficiently identified. Lycaon (talk) 17:19, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Okay, so do you mean i have to put an arrow pointing towards the bee labeling it as a bee, and the same for a flower? Thomas888b (talk) 17:30, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Not really. You should add the species of bumblebee (scientific name) and ditto for the flower. Lycaon (talk) 17:54, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

This is an example. Regards. Lycaon (talk) 18:04, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Ah, Okay, I understand now. What if i'm unsure of the species?Thomas888b (talk) 18:12, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

You can ask around. User:Alvesgaspar is quite good in bees, User:Wsiegmund knows his plants. I know a few things myself, but have not much time atm. Regards. Lycaon (talk) 18:16, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks - Thomas888b (talk) 18:36, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Closure of Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Inuit man demonstrates traditional kayaking technique used for hunting on narwhals.jpg

Hi Lycaon, could you please explain this edit to me? I see two problems in it: Firstly, it changes a summary of this candidacy by George Chernilevsky. I would expect a signature by yourself if you think that the {{FPC-results-reviewed}} line needs to be corrected. Secondly, I wonder where you see the fifth opposing vote. I see just four. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 20:00, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Please count again (properly). Lycaon (talk) 21:20, 25 October 2010 (UTC)