Hi Orinonist,
Thanks for your SVG conversion to the Greater Manchester flag. I was wondering if I could be cheeky enough to ask if you'd be willing and able to do the same for File:County Flag of Tyne & Wear.png? There are loads of English county flags that need SVG conversion, but this one is probably the easiest. I'd be very greatful, and won't ask again! :S Jza84 (talk) 15:00, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi Jza84. Request to your heart's content! I have no problem as long as you don't mind my time frame, since I tend to have a backlog most of the time. However, simple requests can be done quickly. This one will be done by tomorrow. Best regards and happy holidays! -- Orionist ★ talk 12:26, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi, and thanks for getting back to me. No problem with the time frame at all, I'm just greatful that we're raising the standard for our readers. Thanks again and happy holidays also. Jza84 (talk) 12:49, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Done as promised: File:County Flag of Tyne & Wear.svg. Regards, -- Orionist ★ talk 12:30, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Very kindly done. Thanks again and happy 2011 :) Jza84 (talk) 14:54, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I "want" to keep the turtle image! I'm sensitive to both the appearance and substance of blowing off copyright. That said, I really don't think this thing is questionable morally or in liability. And I think it would be a mistake to not allow at least fair use (but my impression is the rules types won't allow it). They will say it's not "nescessary" (crucial as opposed to thoughtful and additive) and not really consider the sliding scale of usefulness versus amount of damage done (I really think I could put that pic in a coffee table book and be safe).
If we have misunderstood de minimus (I just jumpd to thinking it meant like the laptop screens in the airplane photo), then please upgrade our thinking. Obviously surviving a Commons AFD would be most helpful to me.
and actually I agree that the design AS A DESIGN, while seen is not as important as the sign and it's context. I can show more blown up things, like with sign only, or even design only, in other articles. So maybe there is something here we are missing. Would really apprecaite your sophistication (not just for this pic, which I LOVE, but also for the issue and our future benefit.)
Respectfully,
TCO (talk) 04:06, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, just wanted to say thank you for your two fixes to that title page. Much appreciated! Best, MarmadukePercy (talk) 11:11, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- No problem! Thanks for the nice note! -- Orionist ★ talk 12:35, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Orionist,
Just wondered if you'd be willing and able to redraw File:County Flag of Merseyside.png as an SVG? If so, then it would be more stylistically correct to use crowns derived from this version (it is a little cruder, but uses crowns that appear more precisely on the corresponding coat of arms). I'd be very greatful if you could do this one (there's no immediate rush). Jza84 (talk) 01:04, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi Jza84, sure, I'll do it in the coming week. Regards, -- Orionist ★ talk 21:45, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Done as promised: File:County Flag of Merseyside.svg. There could be very slight deviations as I regularized the shapes. I hope you like it. Regards! -- Orionist ★ talk 12:43, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Wow! It's perfect! Just like the official version and the coat of arms. Great work! Jza84 (talk) 13:20, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hey! You uploaded incorrect Gdynia Coat of Arms - please look at bottom fish on tail. LeinaD dyskusja 23:07, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah! Thanks for catching that! I don't know how it escaped me (both puns intended :P). It's fixed now. Regards, -- Orionist ★ talk 00:06, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have a good knowledge of many aspects of PostScript (see Category:Generated by PostScript), but I'm really not a big PowerPoint or Desktop Publishing type, sorry, and I never heard of Scribus before (though "Scribus 1.3.3.7" sounds 'Leet...  ). -- AnonMoos (talk) 03:45, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
File:St_Michael_logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
| Philafrenzy ( talk) 17:34, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, User:Orionist. How are you? I have come to ask a favor from you. Several months before, you helped me remove the watermark from some images. Recently, I uploaded two new images (File:Kapoor IIFA10.jpg & File:KareenaatIIFA10.jpg) and I was wondering if you could do the same for me. I would really appreciate it if you could help me out with this. Please and thank you. Regards -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 19:49, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello Bollywood Dreamz. I'll be busy for a few days, but I'll try to fit these in my next week's schedule. Regards, -- Orionist ★ talk 17:46, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Orionist. As you have helped me before, I was wondering if could bother you again. A photo I once uploaded of Mordechai Rotenberg which I used with the permission of his family was deleted. He has now sent me an explicit e-mail authorizing its use. How do I go about restoring it or uploading it again?--Gilabrand (talk) 07:20, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Orionist,
Just wondered if you could remove the black line around the border of File:County Flag of Greater Manchester.svg, so that it matches File:County Flag of Greater Manchester.png? Reason being that this seems to be the commonest format and like that which is being sold and flown. Hope you can help, Jza84 (talk) 06:39, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
CategorizationBot ( talk) 21:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
File:Geng0901181.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
| Morning Sunshine ( talk) 16:33, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
File:Pedro II 1851 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
| - Darwin Ahoy! 23:25, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
File:Katy Perry in pink.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
| Ronhjones (Talk) 17:50, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
File:Coat of arms of the Philippines TEMP.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
| Fry1989 eh? 02:48, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Orionist! No problems for me and sorry for mistake.  Done? Regards. Érico Wouters msg 17:10, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- No problems
 . Cheers. Érico Wouters msg 00:54, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
| العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−
|
|
| This media may be deleted.
|
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:3GPP Long Term Evolution Country Map.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.
If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! | Leyo 04:23, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
File:City of Edinburgh flag.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
| Lewis Hulbert ( talk) 12:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Can you actualize that file. In 2014 now many marriage amenmets changed by court decisions ==
California, Oregon, Virginia, North Carolina, Nevada, Colorado, Utah, Oklahoma, West Virginia and Alaska should all now longer red in that File. 188.96.184.93
Hi Orionist,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed File:XM and Sirius subscribers.svg is out of date. 2006 is the last year shown Could you update it? Thanks again. —voidxor (talk | contrib) 20:30, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi voidxor. Apologies for the late reply. I looked around the web and failed to find a source with updated numbers. I found the company's annual report for 2014 and it only contains full year numbers for 2012-2014. If you can provide me with a source for numbers I'll be happy to update the chart. Cheers! -- Orionist ★ talk 18:21, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi ; new level 4 for you ?
--Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 14:51, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
|
