User talk:GRuban

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Revision as of 07:37, 1 April 2016 by 217.65.221.174 (talk) (File:Emily Ratajkowski.jpg has been nominated for deletion)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Images from videos

Hello GRuban,

I see that some of your recent uploads are derived from videos on youtube. Examples are File:Brianna Wu standing.jpg and File:Carolyn Talcott.jpg. However I could not find a publicly stated release of those image/the content of the videos. Could you expand on the permission for those images?

Mvg, Basvb (talk) 09:44, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The YouTube release is under the Show More section on any YouTube page that has one. I linked to each. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndvOiDTiJb8 for example.
BTW, I notice you are the person who nominated Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Spacekatgal on the grounds that Spacekatgal, also known as w:Brianna Wu is not notable? And then found other photos that she gave to interviewers, and used them as more evidence that she was not their owner? Now we're going to have to track down this rather busy person, who is right now not very happy with the Internet as a whole, and say: "You know those images you gave us? We deleted them. Please give us more, and this time write even more in the description, and send an email to OTRS, and we'll think of a few more hoops for you to jump through soon. Thanks." Next time you read about Wikipedia being hard for article subjects to use, this is what was meant. --GRuban (talk) 21:11, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

can't fix google from Wikipedia

btw, this occurs also on bing, with feedback in opposite corner [1]. 198.24.31.118 17:29, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brooke Elliott.jpg

File:Brooke Elliott.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Lady Lotus (talk) 12:36, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lungerjournalismus.jpg

Hi. I'm trying to license review https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lungerjournalismus.jpg which you write should be licensed under cc-by-sa 3.0. I'm reading https://twitter.com/kaibiermann/status/489212045829894144 and can't see that. My German ability is on the line between terrible and nonexistent, but as best I can read, Kai Biermann says "Use it under CC only with attribution." That's either too vague for us, or it's cc-by. Which could also work, but isn't cc-by-sa 3.0... Ideally, could you ask him to specifiy the license, for example "I release this work under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"? Or I guess we could change the license on the file to cc-by and hope that no stricter reviewer complains... again, if Kai Biermanncould be specific, that would be best. As you can guess, I don't get out to DE much, so if you want to discuss, please catch me at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:GRuban --GRuban (Diskussion) 15:03, 10. Aug. 2015 (CEST)

I think, I more or less copied what wrote, SMSed, or said to me. I do not remember the details, only that he had used the image in a tweet of his before. Please try to contact him avoiding indirect communication. I told him that I wanted to upload it to commons, which he himself was not inclined to do but agreed that I did it, giving the quoted license. --Purodha Blissenbach (Diskussion)
You linked to the details. That twitter link points to what he wrote: "steht unter cc, bei Namensnennung nur zu" That - in my feeble machine aided translation - was what he wrote. I would prefer not to contact him myself. I don't know him, I don't even know who he is, and in addition, I don't speak German. I don't even have a Twitter account. I won't be able to follow his Twitter to wait for his response. So asking me to ask him is ... not as good as your asking him. Also, of course, I have 677 other images in https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:License_review_needed to review. Please, feel free to blame me, writing "some annoying volunteer reviewer at Wikimedia Commons wants you to specify the license, could you please tweet 'I release this work under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/'" - except in German, of course. But I'm afraid, for all the above reasons, I can't take it upon myself to do so. Thank you. --GRuban (talk) 13:28, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kylie Jenner for Nip + Fab.jpg

File:Kylie Jenner for Nip + Fab.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

NearEMPTiness (talk) 03:23, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kylie Jenner headshot.jpg

File:Kylie Jenner headshot.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

NearEMPTiness (talk) 03:24, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Prove?

Your message was somewhat violent; I'm sure that was not your intention, but to make a demand or "else," well, it is not gentile. What I write about the images I have uploaded to Wiki-Common is true & accurate. Chaos4tu (talk) 10:47, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is about Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Chaos4tu, where I wrote "the uploader is basically claiming to be Sterling Saint James. The uploader needs to write to COM:OTRS and prove it."? If so, apologies. I'd be happy to learn an alternate phrasing that would be more gentle and convey the same information. How about "The uploader needs to write to COM:OTRS and verify their identity"? --GRuban (talk) 20:27, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Teo Trandafir.png

Yes, it's from the video you selected. Thanks.Ionutzmovie (talk) 03:39, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brooke Elliott.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Brooke Elliott.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

CennoxX (talk) 10:37, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That was strange. It was properly licensed at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fo_iIC3hXJI as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brooke Elliott.jpg determined, what did you have against it? (I see User:Natuur12 deleted it anyway, without any discussion; what was that?) --GRuban (talk) 21:05, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Natuur put it back. Good. --GRuban (talk) 21:34, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Holly Holm.jpg

File:Holly Holm.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

—howcheng {chat} 16:50, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn: thanks. No hard feelings, just doing your job, understood. --GRuban (talk) 19:08, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The source you've given for File:Emily O'Brien.jpg is the same as the source you give for File:Ciara Hanna.jpg. It's the correct source video for File:Ciara Hanna.jpg. The correct source for File:Emily O'Brien.jpg is needed. Let me know when you've updated it so I can review it. INeverCry 21:31, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ack! Thanks, fixed! --GRuban (talk) 22:14, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've passed the review and adjusted the license, which is {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} at the source rather than {{Cc-by-3.0}}. I did the same for the Ciara Hanna image. INeverCry 22:25, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Agh. Thanks again. Sorry for the mistakes. I'm normally better than this. :-(. --GRuban (talk) 01:05, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. Just a couple of minor hiccups. I'm happy to help. INeverCry 03:06, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Google Knowledge Panel.png

File:Google Knowledge Panel.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Josve05a (talk) 02:15, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please...

... let me point to something that could be a nice PD-mark brainteaser... ;-) Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Public_domain_question_related_to_a_Flickr_sourced_file Kind regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 01:07, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Heh. Solved it much the way Alexander untied the Gordian knot ... --GRuban (talk) 01:44, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emily Ratajkowski.jpg

File:Emily Ratajkowski.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

217.65.221.174 07:37, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GRuban&oldid=191840781"